QTUM ranks 1st and ROBT 8th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
QTUM vs ROBT
QTUM −0.25pt a year
0.40%0.65%
QTUM 9.2×the volume
362K39.2K
QTUM +21.2pt
+21.5%+0.3%
QTUM vs ROBT Performance
+164.9%+1.6%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- ROBT 0.65%
- QTUM $5.06B
- ROBT $723M
- QTUM +17.5%, better
- ROBT −0.2%
- QTUM 1.05%, better
- ROBT 0.02%
- QTUM 89
- ROBT 117
- QTUM 362K sh, better
- ROBT 39.2K sh
- QTUM $134.11
- ROBT $55.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QTUM | ROBT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | C52 |
| Mission | A74 | A79Higher |
| Risk | A70Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | A91Higher | A86 |
| Durability | A79 | A81Higher |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. QTUM and ROBT are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QTUMA
ROBTB
In short
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
ROBT AI plus the machines it runs. ROBT has tracked a Nasdaq index of global artificial intelligence and robotics companies since 2018, spreading the theme across roughly 110 names.
Stated mandate
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
ROBT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QTUM vs ROBT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QTUM vs ROBT Cost
Overpaying ROBT vs QTUM
$4,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
ROBT 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QTUM | ROBT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,163 | $440 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $4,440 | $1,647 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $12,717 | $4,627 |
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- 0.65%ROBT
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
ROBT 14th cheapest of 30 funds
QTUM vs ROBT Dividends
- QTUM 1.05%, better
- ROBT 0.02%
- QTUM $1.40
- ROBT $0.0094
- QTUM $0.46
- ROBT $0.0094
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- ROBT Jun 25, 2026
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- ROBT Jun 30, 2026
- QTUM Quarterly
- ROBT Irregular
Distribution history
QTUM vs ROBT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QTUM
- ROBT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QTUM 28.6%ROBT 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QTUM 1.30, betterROBT 0.55
- Worst fall
- QTUM −38.4%, betterROBT −43.3%
- Market sensitivity
- QTUM 1.67ROBT 1.55
QTUM and ROBT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



