QTUM ranks 1st and TEKY 15th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
QTUM vs TEKY
QTUM −0.10pt a year
0.40%0.50%
QTUM 664.9×the volume
362K544
QTUM vs TEKY Performance
+17.5%−0.6%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- TEKY 0.50%
- QTUM $5.06B
- TEKY $56M
- QTUM +17.5%, better
- TEKY −0.6%
- QTUM 1.05%, better
- TEKY 0.19%
- QTUM 89
- TEKY 45
- QTUM 362K sh, better
- TEKY 544 sh
- QTUM $134.11
- TEKY $43.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QTUM | TEKY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | A79 |
| Mission | A74Higher | B67 |
| Risk | A70Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | F3 |
| Holdings | A91Higher | A73 |
| Durability | A79Higher | C51 |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. QTUM and TEKY are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QTUMA
TEKYC
In short
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
TEKY Most AI ETFs hand the job to an index. TEKY is the stock-picker's version: Lazard analysts run a concentrated global book of roughly 50 names across the whole AI stack, from chipmakers to the firms selling AI software onward.
Stated mandate
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
TEKY The Portfolio normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity and equity-related securities of or related to next-generation technology companies worldwide, including companies involved in artificial intelligence and automation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QTUM vs TEKY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QTUM vs TEKY Cost
Overpaying TEKY vs QTUM
$1,889
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
TEKY 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QTUM | TEKY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $900 | $177 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $3,460 | $667 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $9,979 | $1,889 |
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- 0.50%TEKY
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
TEKY 7th cheapest of 30 funds
QTUM vs TEKY Dividends
- QTUM 1.05%, better
- TEKY 0.19%
- QTUM $1.40
- TEKY $0.08
- QTUM $0.46
- TEKY $0.08
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- TEKY Mar 20, 2026
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- TEKY Mar 23, 2026
- QTUM Quarterly
- TEKY Irregular
Distribution history
QTUM vs TEKY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QTUM 28.6%TEKY 29.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QTUM 1.30TEKY 0.81
- Worst fall
- QTUM −38.4%TEKY −21.4%
- Market sensitivity
- QTUM 1.67TEKY 1.92
QTUM and TEKY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


