Skip to content

QTUM vs TEKY

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUMANasdaq

Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF

TEKYCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

QTUM −0.10pt a year

QTUM0.40%TEKY0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

QTUM 664.9×the volume

QTUM362KTEKY544

QTUM vs TEKY Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+17.5%QTUM−0.6%TEKY

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. QTUM +17.5%. TEKY −0.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QTUM 0.40%, better
TEKY 0.50%
Fund size
QTUM $5.06B
TEKY $56M
1Y total return
QTUM +17.5%, better
TEKY −0.6%
Yield (12M)
QTUM 1.05%, better
TEKY 0.19%
Holdings
QTUM 89
TEKY 45
Avg volume (30D)
QTUM 362K sh, better
TEKY 544 sh
NAV per share
QTUM $134.11
TEKY $43.23
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QTUM: Cost 86, Risk 70, Mission 74, Tradability 70, Holdings 91, Durability 79. TEKY: Cost 79, Risk 44, Mission 67, Tradability 3, Holdings 73, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for QTUM, TEKY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQTUMTEKY
Cost30% weightA86HigherA79
Mission25% weightA74HigherB67
Risk15% weightA70HigherC44
Tradability15% weightA70HigherF3
Holdings10% weightA91HigherA73
Durability5% weightA79HigherC51

Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QTUM and TEKY are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Artificial Intelligence⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

QTUM ranks 1st and TEKY 15th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.

  1. Rank 1AQTUMDefiance Quantum ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 1AXAIXXtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 13BTHNQROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETFScore 56
  4. Rank 15CTEKYLazard Next Gen Technologies ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 16CIVESDan Ives Wedbush AI Revolution ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QTUMADefiance Quantum ETF

TEKYCLazard Next Gen Technologies ETF

In short

QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.

TEKY Most AI ETFs hand the job to an index. TEKY is the stock-picker's version: Lazard analysts run a concentrated global book of roughly 50 names across the whole AI stack, from chipmakers to the firms selling AI software onward.

Stated mandate

QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.

TEKY The Portfolio normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity and equity-related securities of or related to next-generation technology companies worldwide, including companies involved in artificial intelligence and automation.

Why people hold it

  • QTUM 0.40% a year against a 0.68% median for its AI-theme cohort, and it undercuts peers like WTAI (0.45%) and ALAI (0.55%).
  • Rules-based by design: it tracks the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index, so no manager is hand-picking which quantum story wins.
  • About 90 holdings across global markets, so the theme rides on a basket instead of two or three pure plays.
  • Size and liquidity back it up: a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the stronger implementations in its thematic peer group.
  • TEKY Active by design. Managers hold roughly 40 to 60 names spanning AI hardware infrastructure, enabling technologies and application vendors, instead of tracking a theme index.sec.gov
  • Cheap for an active thematic: 0.50% net of a fee waiver (0.60% gross), below the category median fee and under active peer IGPT at 0.57%.
  • The mandate is worldwide, not US-only. At least 80% of assets go to next-gen tech companies anywhere, via common stock, ADRs and global depositary receipts.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • QTUM Risk is the softest part of the profile. One narrow, early-stage theme in a single asset class means sharper swings than a broad-market fund.
  • The index covers machine learning as well as quantum, so part of the basket is familiar AI exposure rather than quantum specialists.
  • Distributions come quarterly, but a growth theme like this is not built around income.
  • TEKY Thinly traded. Spreads and market impact can cost more than the expense ratio, which matters most on bigger orders.
  • Non-diversified under SEC rules and concentrated by construction, so one issuer or one corner of the AI stack can swing the fund harder.lazardassetmanagement.com
  • Launched in 2025, so the record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than quarterly.

Full QTUM profile⁠

Full TEKY profile⁠

QTUM vs TEKY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QTUM vs TEKY Cost

Overpaying TEKY vs QTUM

$1,889

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QTUM 0.40%

    $8,090

  • TEKY 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QTUM 0.40%
  • TEKY 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530TEKY $9,979QTUM $8,090

Year by year

YearQTUMTEKYOverpaying
10$723$900$177
20$2,793$3,460$667
30$8,090$9,979$1,889

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
  • 0.50%TEKY
  • Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
  • Median 0.65%

QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds

TEKY 7th cheapest of 30 funds

QTUM vs TEKY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QTUM 1.05%, better
TEKY 0.19%
Payout (12M)
QTUM $1.40
TEKY $0.08
Last payment
QTUM $0.46
TEKY $0.08
Ex-dividend
QTUM Sep 23, 2026
TEKY Mar 20, 2026
Paid on
QTUM Sep 24, 2026
TEKY Mar 23, 2026
Frequency
QTUM Quarterly
TEKY Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

QTUMQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll QTUM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2018 $0.04; Mar 12, 2019 $0.02; Jun 24, 2019 $0.08; Sep 17, 2019 $0.04; Dec 26, 2019 $0.04; Mar 24, 2020 $0.03; Jun 23, 2020 $0.07; Sep 22, 2020 $0.06; Dec 29, 2020 $0.05; Mar 24, 2021 $0.03; Jun 23, 2021 $0.10; Sep 22, 2021 $0.08; Dec 29, 2021 $0.07; Mar 23, 2022 $0.08; Jun 22, 2022 $0.19; Sep 21, 2022 $0.23; Dec 28, 2022 $0.07; Mar 22, 2023 $0.08; Jun 21, 2023 $0.12; Sep 20, 2023 $0.15; Dec 27, 2023 $0.09; Mar 20, 2024 $0.10; Jun 26, 2024 $0.20; Sep 25, 2024 $0.12; Dec 27, 2024 $0.08; Mar 26, 2025 $0.16; Jun 25, 2025 $0.27; Sep 24, 2025 $0.24; Dec 29, 2025 $0.45; Mar 25, 2026 $0.22; Jun 24, 2026 $0.27; Sep 23, 2026 $0.46. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
TEKYIrregular · 2 paymentsAll TEKY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2025 $0.02; Mar 20, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

QTUM vs TEKY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QTUM 28.6%TEKY 29.3%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QTUM 1.30TEKY 0.81since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QTUM −38.4%TEKY −21.4%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QTUM 1.67TEKY 1.92

QTUM and TEKY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QTUMAvsXAIXA

    Defiance Quantum ETF · Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TEKYCvsXAIXA

    Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF · Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTUMAvsARTYA

    Defiance Quantum ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TEKYCvsARTYA

    Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTUMAvsAIHYB

    Defiance Quantum ETF · Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TEKYCvsAIHYB

    Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF · Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.