Skip to content

RAA vs UCBG

SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF

RAABNasdaq

State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

UCBGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

UCBG −0.79pt a year

RAA0.85%UCBG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

UCBG 95.3×the volume

RAA43.6KUCBG4.15M

RAA vs UCBG Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

0.0%RAA−0.9%UCBG

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. RAA 0.0%. UCBG −0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−0.5%0.5%1%1.5%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
RAA 0.85%
UCBG 0.06%, better
Fund size
RAA $645M
UCBG $2.52B
1Y total return
RAA +10.2%
UCBG No data
Yield (12M)
RAA 2.09%
UCBG No data
Holdings
RAA 181
UCBG 868
Avg volume (30D)
RAA 43.6K sh
UCBG 4.15M sh, better
NAV per share
RAA $30.27
UCBG $50.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RAA: Cost 22, Risk 61, Mission 83, Tradability 74, Holdings 73, Durability 70. UCBG: Cost 100, Risk not scored, Mission 99, Tradability 99, Holdings 79, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for RAA, UCBG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRAAUCBG
Cost30% weightF22A100Higher
Mission25% weightA83A99Higher
Risk15% weightB61Not scored
Tradability15% weightA74A99Higher
Holdings10% weightA73A79Higher
Durability5% weightA70HigherB66

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RAA and UCBG are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 37 funds
See all 37 ›

UCBG ranks 1st and RAA 14th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 14BELMElm Market Navigator ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 14BRAASMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 16BRAAXVanEck Real Assets ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RAABSMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF

UCBGAState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

In short

RAA Most allocation ETFs pick a stock/bond mix and coast. RAA runs a model that rechecks the split monthly and can pivot into alternatives: gold, commodities, energy shares, even managed futures.

UCBG No data

Stated mandate

RAA The actively managed fund uses the proprietary REAL Asset Allocation strategy to dynamically divide assets among stocks, bonds, and alternatives, reassessing allocations monthly and rebalancing as the model changes.

UCBG No data

Why people hold it

  • RAA Three sleeves, not two. Stocks, bonds and alternatives, with allocations reassessed monthly and rebalanced when the model moves.
  • The alternatives bucket has real range: commodities, gold, energy equities and managed futures, including strategies that can short bonds.sec.gov
  • Trend-following at its core. The mix follows the model's read of conditions rather than a fixed 60/40 or a birthday-based glide path.
  • Stays close to the mandate written in its filings, and stands among the stronger entries in a crowded allocation field. Pays quarterly.

UCBG No data

Worth knowing

  • RAA 0.85% a year is above the typical allocation ETF and far above index-built rivals such as AOA (0.19%) and NTSX (0.20%). Active tilting is the thing you're paying for.
  • Discretionary by design. The allocation comes from a proprietary model, not a published index you can look up and track yourself.
  • Young fund, short live record. There isn't yet a full market cycle to show how the model handles a real regime change.sec.gov

UCBG No data

Full RAA profile⁠

Full UCBG profile⁠

RAA vs UCBG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RAA vs UCBG Cost

Overpaying RAA vs UCBG

$14,929

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RAA 0.85%

    $16,199

  • UCBG 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RAA 0.85%
  • UCBG 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RAA $16,199UCBG $1,270

Year by year

YearRAAUCBGOverpaying
10$1,508$110$1,398
20$5,706$432$5,274
30$16,199$1,270$14,929

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%RAA
  • 0.06%UCBG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.57%

UCBG cheapest of 37 funds

RAA 29th cheapest of 37 funds

RAA vs UCBG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RAA 2.09%
UCBG No data
Payout (12M)
RAA $0.62
UCBG No data
Last payment
RAA $0.13
UCBG $0.04
Ex-dividend
RAA Sep 16, 2026
UCBG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
RAA Sep 17, 2026
UCBG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
RAA Quarterly
UCBG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

RAAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll RAA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 17, 2025 $0.11; Sep 17, 2025 $0.13; Dec 24, 2025 $0.35; Mar 18, 2026 $0.05; Jun 17, 2026 $0.10; Sep 16, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
UCBGIrregular · 1 paymentAll UCBG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

RAA vs UCBG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RAA 9.3%since Mar 2025UCBG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RAA 0.98since Mar 2025UCBG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RAA −11.8%since Feb 2025UCBG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RAA 0.67UCBG 0.00

RAA and UCBG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RAABvsAOAA

    SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsAOAA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RAABvsIRTRA

    SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsIRTRA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RAABvsINCEA

    SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsINCEA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.