IRTR ranks 3rd and RAA 14th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
IRTR vs RAA
IRTR −0.77pt a year
0.08%0.85%
RAA 3.4×the volume
12.7K43.6K
IRTR vs RAA Performance
+5.1%+10.2%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- RAA 0.85%
- IRTR $60M
- RAA $645M
- IRTR +5.1%
- RAA +10.2%, better
- IRTR 3.17%, better
- RAA 2.09%
- IRTR 29140
- RAA 181
- IRTR 12.7K sh
- RAA 43.6K sh, better
- IRTR $31.52
- RAA $30.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IRTR | RAA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F22 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A83 |
| Risk | A82Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | B62 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | A80Higher | A73 |
| Durability | B56 | A70Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. IRTR and RAA are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IRTRA
RAAB
In short
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
RAA Most allocation ETFs pick a stock/bond mix and coast. RAA runs a model that rechecks the split monthly and can pivot into alternatives: gold, commodities, energy shares, even managed futures.
Stated mandate
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
RAA The actively managed fund uses the proprietary REAL Asset Allocation strategy to dynamically divide assets among stocks, bonds, and alternatives, reassessing allocations monthly and rebalancing as the model changes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IRTR vs RAA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IRTR vs RAA Cost
Overpaying RAA vs IRTR
$14,510
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
RAA 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IRTR | RAA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $1,508 | $1,361 |
| 20 | $575 | $5,706 | $5,131 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $16,199 | $14,510 |
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- 0.85%RAA
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
RAA 29th cheapest of 37 funds
IRTR vs RAA Dividends
- IRTR 3.17%, better
- RAA 2.09%
- IRTR $1.00
- RAA $0.62
- IRTR $0.08
- RAA $0.13
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- RAA Sep 16, 2026
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- RAA Sep 17, 2026
- IRTR Monthly
- RAA Quarterly
Distribution history
IRTR vs RAA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IRTR 7.3%RAA 9.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IRTR 1.14RAA 0.98
- Worst fall
- IRTR −6.3%RAA −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IRTR 0.47RAA 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.