Skip to content

RB vs SCAU

ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF

RBCCboe

Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

SCAUCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCAU −0.28pt a year

RB0.58%SCAU0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

SCAU 11.2×the volume

RB377SCAU4.21K

RB vs SCAU Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.8%RB+0.4%SCAU

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. RB +0.8%. SCAU +0.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1.5%−1%−0.5%0%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
RB 0.58%
SCAU 0.30%, better
Fund size
RB $1M
SCAU $1M
1Y total return
RB +12.7%
SCAU No data
Yield (12M)
RB 2.31%
SCAU No data
Holdings
RB 1952
SCAU 4
Avg volume (30D)
RB 377 sh
SCAU 4.21K sh, better
NAV per share
RB $46.63
SCAU $24.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RB: Cost 80, Risk 89, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 80, Durability 33. SCAU: Cost 93, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 6.
Pillar letters and Scores for RB, SCAU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRBSCAU
Cost30% weightA80A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA89HigherD27
Tradability15% weightC41C46Higher
Holdings10% weightA80Not scored
Durability5% weightD33HigherF6

Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RB and SCAU are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Russell 2000 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

RB ranks 7th and SCAU 7th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 5CKJULInnovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 49
  2. Rank 7CRBProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40
  3. Rank 7CSCAUCorgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  4. Rank 7CSCJLCorgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40

RB vs SCAU Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RB vs SCAU Cost

Overpaying RB vs SCAU

$5,304

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RB 0.58%

    $11,453

  • SCAU 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RB 0.58%
  • SCAU 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530RB $11,453SCAU $6,149

Year by year

YearRBSCAUOverpaying
10$1,041$545$496
20$3,986$2,113$1,873
30$11,453$6,149$5,304

Expense ratio

  • 0.58%RB
  • 0.30%SCAU, cheaper
  • Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.77%

SCAU cheapest of 14 funds

RB 5th cheapest of 14 funds

RB vs SCAU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RB 2.31%
SCAU No data
Payout (12M)
RB $1.08
SCAU None
Last payment
RB $0.15
SCAU No data
Ex-dividend
RB Sep 23, 2026
SCAU No data
Paid on
RB Sep 29, 2026
SCAU No data
Frequency
RB Quarterly
SCAU No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

RBQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll RB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 24, 2025 $0.13; Dec 24, 2025 $0.64; Mar 25, 2026 $0.15; Jun 24, 2026 $0.14; Sep 23, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
SCAUAll SCAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RB vs SCAU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RB 3.5%since Jul 2025SCAU No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RB 2.68since Jul 2025SCAU No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RB −2.4%since Jun 2025SCAU No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RB 0.08SCAU 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • RBCvsQBKFB

    ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCAUCvsQBKFB

    Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RBCvsQBKVB

    ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCAUCvsQBKVB

    Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RBCvsKOCTB

    ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCAUCvsKOCTB

    Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.