RYLD ranks 1st and RDTE 7th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
RDTE vs RYLD
RYLD −0.37pt a year
0.97%0.60%
RYLD 4.5×the volume
112K504K
RDTE vs RYLD Performance
+14.3%+12.1%
- RDTE 0.97%
- RYLD 0.60%, better
- RDTE $153M
- RYLD $1.3B
- RDTE +14.3%, better
- RYLD +12.1%
- RDTE 42.51%, better
- RYLD 12.18%
- RDTE 4
- RYLD 6
- RDTE 112K sh
- RYLD 504K sh, better
- RDTE $25.85
- RYLD $15.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RDTE | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A97Higher |
| Risk | D35 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | C45Higher |
| Durability | B57 | A86Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. RDTE and RYLD are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RDTEC
RYLDA
In short
RDTE Roundhill took its 0DTE playbook to small caps. RDTE writes same-day-expiring calls against synthetic Russell 2000 exposure, aiming to convert daily option premium into a weekly income stream.
RYLD The veteran of small-cap options income. Launched in 2019 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it owns the Russell 2000 and sells calls against it, swapping some upside for a monthly check.
Stated mandate
RDTE The Fund primarily seeks current income and secondarily seeks capital appreciation. It uses a synthetic covered-call strategy to generate weekly income while providing exposure to the Russell 2000 Index’s price return.
RYLD The Fund is designed to track the price and yield performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RDTE vs RYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RDTE vs RYLD Cost
Overpaying RDTE vs RYLD
$6,381
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RDTE 0.97%
$18,198
RYLD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RDTE | RYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,076 | $636 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $4,116 | $2,327 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $11,817 | $6,381 |
- 0.97%RDTE
- 0.60%RYLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
RYLD 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
RDTE 7th cheapest of 9 funds
RDTE vs RYLD Dividends
- RDTE 42.51%, better
- RYLD 12.18%
- RDTE $10.97
- RYLD $1.87
- RDTE $0.08
- RYLD $0.15
- RDTE Oct 29, 2026
- RYLD Oct 19, 2026
- RDTE Oct 30, 2026
- RYLD Oct 22, 2026
- RDTE Weekly
- RYLD Monthly
Distribution history
RDTE vs RYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RDTE 16.2%RYLD 8.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- RDTE 0.56RYLD 0.73
- Worst fall
- RDTE −24.2%RYLD −21.4%
- Market sensitivity
- RDTE 1.04RYLD 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.