IWMW ranks 2nd and RDTE 7th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
IWMW vs RDTE
IWMW −0.58pt a year
0.39%0.97%
RDTE 7.6×the volume
14.8K112K
IWMW vs RDTE Performance
+9.7%+14.3%
- IWMW 0.39%, better
- RDTE 0.97%
- IWMW $55M
- RDTE $153M
- IWMW +9.7%
- RDTE +14.3%, better
- IWMW 20.14%
- RDTE 42.51%, better
- IWMW 1970
- RDTE 4
- IWMW 14.8K sh
- RDTE 112K sh, better
- IWMW $37.45
- RDTE $25.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWMW | RDTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A86Higher | A70 |
| Risk | D39Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | C51 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | D37 |
| Durability | B64Higher | B57 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. IWMW and RDTE are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMWA
RDTEC
In short
IWMW Small-cap income, stripped down: IWMW owns a Russell 2000 index fund and writes monthly covered calls against it, at 0.39% a year when most Russell 2000 call-writers charge more.
RDTE Roundhill took its 0DTE playbook to small caps. RDTE writes same-day-expiring calls against synthetic Russell 2000 exposure, aiming to convert daily option premium into a weekly income stream.
Stated mandate
IWMW The fund seeks to track an index holding the iShares Russell 2000 ETF and writes monthly covered calls to generate income.
RDTE The Fund primarily seeks current income and secondarily seeks capital appreciation. It uses a synthetic covered-call strategy to generate weekly income while providing exposure to the Russell 2000 Index’s price return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWMW vs RDTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWMW vs RDTE Cost
Overpaying RDTE vs IWMW
$10,300
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWMW 0.39%
$7,898
RDTE 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWMW | RDTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,712 | $1,007 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $6,443 | $3,718 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $18,198 | $10,300 |
- 0.39%IWMW, cheaper
- 0.97%RDTE
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
IWMW 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
RDTE 7th cheapest of 9 funds
IWMW vs RDTE Dividends
- IWMW 20.14%
- RDTE 42.51%, better
- IWMW $7.52
- RDTE $10.97
- IWMW $0.59
- RDTE $0.08
- IWMW Oct 2, 2026
- RDTE Oct 29, 2026
- IWMW Oct 7, 2026
- RDTE Oct 30, 2026
- IWMW Monthly
- RDTE Weekly
Distribution history
IWMW vs RDTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWMW 12.4%RDTE 16.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWMW 0.37RDTE 0.56
- Worst fall
- IWMW −21.9%RDTE −24.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IWMW 0.75RDTE 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.