FTKI ranks 4th and RDTE 7th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
FTKI vs RDTE
FTKI −0.11pt a year
0.86%0.97%
RDTE 16.8×the volume
6.66K112K
FTKI vs RDTE Performance
+19.9%+14.3%
- FTKI 0.86%, better
- RDTE 0.97%
- FTKI $25M
- RDTE $153M
- FTKI +19.9%, better
- RDTE +14.3%
- FTKI 11.81%
- RDTE 42.51%, better
- FTKI 199
- RDTE 4
- FTKI 6.66K sh
- RDTE 112K sh, better
- FTKI $19.56
- RDTE $25.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTKI | RDTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A70 |
| Risk | A82Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | C45 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | D37 |
| Durability | C45 | B57Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. FTKI and RDTE are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTKIB
RDTEC
In short
FTKI Most Russell 2000 income funds own the index and sell calls on it. FTKI runs an actively picked basket of roughly 300 US small caps, then writes index-level calls over the top: income first, appreciation second, paid monthly.
RDTE Roundhill took its 0DTE playbook to small caps. RDTE writes same-day-expiring calls against synthetic Russell 2000 exposure, aiming to convert daily option premium into a weekly income stream.
Stated mandate
FTKI The Fund seeks current income first and capital appreciation second. It primarily invests in small-cap equities listed on U.S. exchanges and writes exchange-traded calls on the Russell 2000 Index or small-cap equity ETFs.
RDTE The Fund primarily seeks current income and secondarily seeks capital appreciation. It uses a synthetic covered-call strategy to generate weekly income while providing exposure to the Russell 2000 Index’s price return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTKI vs RDTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTKI vs RDTE Cost
Overpaying RDTE vs FTKI
$1,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTKI 0.86%
$16,368
RDTE 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTKI | RDTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $1,712 | $187 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $6,443 | $675 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $18,198 | $1,830 |
- 0.86%FTKI, cheaper
- 0.97%RDTE
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
FTKI 6th cheapest of 9 funds
RDTE 7th cheapest of 9 funds
FTKI vs RDTE Dividends
- FTKI 11.81%
- RDTE 42.51%, better
- FTKI $2.31
- RDTE $10.97
- FTKI $0.19
- RDTE $0.08
- FTKI Oct 21, 2026
- RDTE Oct 29, 2026
- FTKI Oct 30, 2026
- RDTE Oct 30, 2026
- FTKI Monthly
- RDTE Weekly
Distribution history
FTKI vs RDTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTKI 10.8%RDTE 16.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTKI 0.61RDTE 0.56
- Worst fall
- FTKI −15.2%RDTE −24.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FTKI 0.27RDTE 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.