TSMG ranks 2nd and RDWU 291st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
RDWU vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.74pt a year
1.50%0.76%
RDWU 23.9×the volume
1.63M68.1K
RDWU vs TSMG Performance
−72.6%−20.0%
- RDWU 1.50%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- RDWU $14M
- TSMG $24M
- RDWU
- TSMG +40.3%
- RDWU 4
- TSMG 6
- RDWU 1.63M sh, better
- TSMG 68.1K sh
- RDWU $2.31
- TSMG $28.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RDWU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A75 |
| Risk | D29 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. RDWU and TSMG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RDWUD
TSMGA
In short
RDWU Leveraged single-stock funds mostly chase mega-cap tech. This one points 2x daily leverage at Redwire (RDW), an industrials name, and resets the exposure every single trading day.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
RDWU The fund seeks to provide 200% of RDW's daily performance, offering short-term leveraged exposure to the company.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RDWU vs TSMG Holdings
How RDWU and TSMG differ
0.0%
About this figure: RDWU gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
TSMG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for RDWU and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in RDWUMore in TSMG | Gap | RDWU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- RDWU205.1%
- TSMG211.0%
- RDWU1
- TSMG2
Asset class
- RDWU
- Stocks
- TSMG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in RDWU1
- In both0
- Only in TSMG2
Only in RDWU
1 security, 5.2% of RDWU by weight
- First American Government Obli First Am Gov Oblig X5.23%
Only in TSMG
2 securities, 21.0% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.98%
- 874039100 Swp10.06%
Weight gaps
RDWU and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RDWU vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying RDWU vs TSMG
$11,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RDWU 1.50%
$26,283
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RDWU | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,353 | $1,237 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,142 | $4,377 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,656 | $11,627 |
- 1.50%RDWU
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 312 funds
RDWU 271st cheapest of 312 funds
RDWU vs TSMG Dividends
- RDWU None
- TSMG
- RDWU
- TSMG $2.73
- RDWU
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- RDWU
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- RDWU
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
RDWU vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RDWU TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- RDWU TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- RDWU TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- RDWU 2.14TSMG 3.98
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.