RING ranks 1st and SLVX 18th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
RING vs SLVX
RING −0.77pt a year
0.39%1.16%
RING 30.5×the volume
649K21.3K
RING vs SLVX Performance
+4.8%−13.1%
- RING 0.39%, better
- SLVX 1.16%
- RING $2.06B
- SLVX $8M
- RING +10.3%
- SLVX
- RING 1.35%
- SLVX
- RING 49
- SLVX 36
- RING 649K sh, better
- SLVX 21.3K sh
- RING $67.07
- SLVX $11.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RING | SLVX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | F0 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | F8 |
| Tradability | A72Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | F22Higher | F8 |
| Durability | A81Higher | D28 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. RING and SLVX are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RINGB
SLVXF
In short
RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.
SLVX A rare active swing at the silver mining complex: the prospectus puts capital appreciation first and current income second, with roughly 50 names chosen by a manager instead of copied from an index. Active pricing comes with it.
Stated mandate
RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.
SLVX The actively managed ETF seeks capital appreciation as its primary objective and current income as its secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RING vs SLVX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RING vs SLVX Cost
Overpaying SLVX vs RING
$13,334
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RING 0.39%
$7,898
SLVX 1.16%
$21,232
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RING | SLVX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $2,032 | $1,327 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $7,580 | $4,855 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $21,232 | $13,334 |
- 0.39%RING, cheaper
- 1.16%SLVX
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds
SLVX 18th cheapest of 18 funds
RING vs SLVX Dividends
- RING 1.35%
- SLVX
- RING $0.90
- SLVX
- RING $0.53
- SLVX $0.06
- RING Jun 15, 2026
- SLVX Oct 26, 2026
- RING Jun 18, 2026
- SLVX Oct 27, 2026
- RING Twice a year
- SLVX Weekly
Distribution history
RING vs SLVX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RING 42.3%SLVX
- Return per unit of risk
- RING 1.01SLVX
- Worst fall
- RING −47.9%SLVX
- Market sensitivity
- RING 0.94SLVX 1.63
RING and SLVX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.16% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.16% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.16% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


