Skip to content

RWL vs SCHK

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

RWLBNYSE Arca

Schwab 1000 Index ETF

SCHKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHK −0.36pt a year

RWL0.39%SCHK0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHK 4.9×the volume

RWL280KSCHK1.38M

5Y return · a year

RWL +2.5pt

RWL+13.3%SCHK+10.8%

RWL vs SCHK Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+86.6%RWL+66.8%SCHK

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. RWL +86.6%. SCHK +66.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%50%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
RWL 0.39%
SCHK 0.03%, better
Fund size
RWL $10.3B
SCHK $5.53B
1Y total return
RWL +23.0%, better
SCHK +13.3%
Yield (12M)
RWL 1.18%, better
SCHK 1.06%
Holdings
RWL 503
SCHK 998
Avg volume (30D)
RWL 280K sh
SCHK 1.38M sh, better
NAV per share
RWL $133.48
SCHK $35.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RWL: Cost 37, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 90, Holdings 71, Durability 81. SCHK: Cost 98, Risk 65, Mission 100, Tradability 90, Holdings 58, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for RWL, SCHK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRWLSCHK
Cost30% weightD37A98Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightA96HigherB65
Tradability15% weightA90A90
Holdings10% weightA71HigherB58
Durability5% weightA81HigherB68

Rank among Other Major Indexes funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RWL and SCHK are both graded against the same 41 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Major Indexes⁠

Category · 41 funds
See all 41 ›

SCHK ranks 2nd and RWL 14th of 41 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYVState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 2ASCHKSchwab 1000 Index ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3APBUSInvesco MSCI USA ETFScore 83
  4. Rank 13BIVOVVanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 14BRWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 14BXJRiShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RWLBInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

SCHKASchwab 1000 Index ETF

In short

RWL Same 500 companies as the S&P 500, sized by sales instead of share price. Revenue weighting with a 5% cap per name shifts weight toward the biggest top lines and away from the crowd sitting at the top of the cap-weighted index.

SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.

Stated mandate

RWL The Fund is based on the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index and uses revenue-based constituent weighting. It invests at least 90% of total assets in securities comprising the Index.

SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • RWL Reweights the S&P 500 by company revenue and caps any single name at 5% at each quarterly rebalance, a different concentration profile than the cap-weighted original.invesco.com
  • Costs 0.39% a year, below the median fee in its index-wrapper peer group, and keeps at least 90% of assets in the index's own constituents.
  • Live since 2008 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund holding roughly 500 stocks, paying quarterly. That is a long runway for a rules-based tilt.
  • Sits in the upper tier of the plain index wrappers we track, helped by a steady risk profile and easy trading.
  • SCHK 0.03% a year, the lowest fee among the top-scoring funds in its index-wrapper group and a small fraction of what the typical fund there charges.
  • About 1,000 stocks covering roughly 90% or more of US stock market value: the S&P 500 names plus a layer of mid caps most large-blend funds skip.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • Tracks its stated index tightly and stands among the strongest implementations in its peer group of plain index wrappers.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively and pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • RWL 0.39% is a real step up from bare-bones S&P 500 trackers like SPYV at 0.04% or SCHK at 0.03%. That gap is what the reweighting costs.
  • Revenue sets the weights, so a high-sales, thin-margin business can outrank a far more profitable one. A genuine departure from the benchmark most people watch.invesco.com
  • Snapping back to revenue weights every quarter means more portfolio turnover than a set-and-forget cap-weighted fund.invesco.com
  • SCHK Weighted by market value, so the biggest US companies drive the bulk of results. Those extra 500 names carry less weight than the headcount suggests.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • All-US, all-equity by mandate: no bonds, no foreign stocks, and it rides the full swings of the US market.
  • The benchmark is Schwab's own proprietary index, so there is no rival fund on the identical yardstick for a side-by-side comparison.

Full RWL profile⁠

Full SCHK profile⁠

RWL vs SCHK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RWL vs SCHK Cost

Overpaying RWL vs SCHK

$7,260

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RWL 0.39%

    $7,898

  • SCHK 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RWL 0.39%
  • SCHK 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RWL $7,898SCHK $638

Year by year

YearRWLSCHKOverpaying
10$705$55$650
20$2,725$216$2,509
30$7,898$638$7,260

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%RWL
  • 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
  • Median 0.29%

SCHK cheapest of 41 funds

RWL 26th cheapest of 41 funds

RWL vs SCHK Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
RWL 1.18%, better
SCHK 1.06%
Payout (12M)
RWL $1.61
SCHK $0.38
Last payment
RWL $0.40
SCHK $0.10
Ex-dividend
RWL Sep 21, 2026
SCHK Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
RWL Sep 25, 2026
SCHK Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
RWL Quarterly
SCHK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RWLQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RWL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Apr 4, 2017 $0.18; Jul 5, 2017 $0.21; Oct 3, 2017 $0.22; Dec 28, 2017 $0.22; Mar 16, 2018 $0.18; Jun 19, 2018 $0.22; Sep 25, 2018 $0.26; Dec 26, 2018 $0.27; Mar 19, 2019 $0.23; Jun 24, 2019 $0.26; Sep 23, 2019 $0.29; Dec 23, 2019 $0.32; Mar 23, 2020 $0.30; Jun 22, 2020 $0.26; Sep 21, 2020 $0.26; Dec 21, 2020 $0.27; Mar 22, 2021 $0.28; Jun 21, 2021 $0.24; Sep 20, 2021 $0.27; Dec 20, 2021 $0.28; Mar 21, 2022 $0.29; Jun 21, 2022 $0.31; Sep 19, 2022 $0.30; Dec 19, 2022 $0.31; Mar 20, 2023 $0.35; Jun 20, 2023 $0.31; Sep 18, 2023 $0.33; Dec 18, 2023 $0.38; Mar 18, 2024 $0.35; Jun 24, 2024 $0.33; Sep 23, 2024 $0.36; Dec 23, 2024 $0.36; Mar 24, 2025 $0.39; Jun 23, 2025 $0.36; Sep 22, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.39; Mar 23, 2026 $0.43; Jun 22, 2026 $0.39; Sep 21, 2026 $0.40. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SCHKQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SCHK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.04; Dec 27, 2017 $0.0025; Mar 16, 2018 $0.04; Jun 26, 2018 $0.06; Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 12, 2018 $0.06; Mar 20, 2019 $0.06; Jun 26, 2019 $0.06; Sep 25, 2019 $0.07; Dec 12, 2019 $0.09; Mar 25, 2020 $0.07; Jun 24, 2020 $0.06; Sep 23, 2020 $0.09; Dec 10, 2020 $0.07; Mar 24, 2021 $0.06; Jun 23, 2021 $0.06; Sep 22, 2021 $0.07; Dec 8, 2021 $0.08; Dec 30, 2021 $0.004; Mar 23, 2022 $0.06; Jun 22, 2022 $0.07; Sep 21, 2022 $0.07; Dec 7, 2022 $0.09; Mar 22, 2023 $0.07; Jun 21, 2023 $0.08; Sep 20, 2023 $0.08; Dec 6, 2023 $0.09; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0035; Mar 20, 2024 $0.08; Jun 26, 2024 $0.08; Sep 25, 2024 $0.08; Dec 11, 2024 $0.10; Mar 26, 2025 $0.08; Jun 25, 2025 $0.09; Sep 24, 2025 $0.09; Dec 10, 2025 $0.10; Mar 25, 2026 $0.09; Jun 24, 2026 $0.09; Sep 23, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

RWL vs SCHK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RWL
  • SCHK
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: SCHK −25.4% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RWL 11.4%, betterSCHK 12.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RWL 1.46, betterSCHK 1.39
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RWL −17.5%, betterSCHK −25.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RWL 0.78SCHK 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • RWLBvsSPYVA

    Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsSPYVA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWLBvsPBUSA

    Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · Invesco MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsPBUSA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · Invesco MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWLBvsVOOVA

    Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsVOOVA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.