SCHK ranks 2nd and RWL 14th of 41 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
RWL vs SCHK
SCHK −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.03%
SCHK 4.9×the volume
280K1.38M
RWL +2.5pt
+13.3%+10.8%
RWL vs SCHK Performance
+86.6%+66.8%
- RWL 0.39%
- SCHK 0.03%, better
- RWL $10.3B
- SCHK $5.53B
- RWL +23.0%, better
- SCHK +13.3%
- RWL 1.18%, better
- SCHK 1.06%
- RWL 503
- SCHK 998
- RWL 280K sh
- SCHK 1.38M sh, better
- RWL $133.48
- SCHK $35.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWL | SCHK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A96Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A90 | A90 |
| Holdings | A71Higher | B58 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B68 |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. RWL and SCHK are both graded against the same 41 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWLB
SCHKA
In short
RWL Same 500 companies as the S&P 500, sized by sales instead of share price. Revenue weighting with a 5% cap per name shifts weight toward the biggest top lines and away from the crowd sitting at the top of the cap-weighted index.
SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.
Stated mandate
RWL The Fund is based on the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index and uses revenue-based constituent weighting. It invests at least 90% of total assets in securities comprising the Index.
SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWL vs SCHK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWL vs SCHK Cost
Overpaying RWL vs SCHK
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWL 0.39%
$7,898
SCHK 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWL | SCHK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $55 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $216 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $638 | $7,260 |
- 0.39%RWL
- 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
SCHK cheapest of 41 funds
RWL 26th cheapest of 41 funds
RWL vs SCHK Dividends
- RWL 1.18%, better
- SCHK 1.06%
- RWL $1.61
- SCHK $0.38
- RWL $0.40
- SCHK $0.10
- RWL Sep 21, 2026
- SCHK Sep 23, 2026
- RWL Sep 25, 2026
- SCHK Sep 28, 2026
- RWL Quarterly
- SCHK Quarterly
Distribution history
RWL vs SCHK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWL
- SCHK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWL 11.4%, betterSCHK 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWL 1.46, betterSCHK 1.39
- Worst fall
- RWL −17.5%, betterSCHK −25.4%
- Market sensitivity
- RWL 0.78SCHK 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.