SPYV ranks 1st and RWL 14th of 41 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
RWL vs SPYV
SPYV −0.35pt a year
0.39%0.04%
SPYV 8.2×the volume
280K2.29M
RWL +2.4pt
+14.5%+12.1%
RWL vs SPYV Performance
+86.6%+71.8%
- RWL 0.39%
- SPYV 0.04%, better
- RWL $10.3B
- SPYV $37.9B
- RWL +23.0%, better
- SPYV +17.6%
- RWL 1.18%
- SPYV 1.64%, better
- RWL 503
- SPYV 436
- RWL 280K sh
- SPYV 2.29M sh, better
- RWL $133.48
- SPYV $63.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWL | SPYV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | A96Higher | A84 |
| Tradability | A90 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A86Higher |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. RWL and SPYV are both graded against the same 41 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWLB
SPYVA
In short
RWL Same 500 companies as the S&P 500, sized by sales instead of share price. Revenue weighting with a 5% cap per name shifts weight toward the biggest top lines and away from the crowd sitting at the top of the cap-weighted index.
SPYV The value side of the S&P 500, tracked since 2000 for four basis points. It does one thing: hold the index names that screen cheap, and charge close to nothing for the privilege.
Stated mandate
RWL The Fund is based on the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index and uses revenue-based constituent weighting. It invests at least 90% of total assets in securities comprising the Index.
SPYV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWL vs SPYV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWL vs SPYV Cost
Overpaying RWL vs SPYV
$7,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWL 0.39%
$7,898
SPYV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWL | SPYV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $73 | $632 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $288 | $2,437 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $849 | $7,049 |
- 0.39%RWL
- 0.04%SPYV, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
SPYV 2nd cheapest of 41 funds
RWL 26th cheapest of 41 funds
RWL vs SPYV Dividends
- RWL 1.18%
- SPYV 1.64%, better
- RWL $1.61
- SPYV $1.06
- RWL $0.40
- SPYV $0.27
- RWL Sep 21, 2026
- SPYV Sep 21, 2026
- RWL Sep 25, 2026
- SPYV Sep 23, 2026
- RWL Quarterly
- SPYV Quarterly
Distribution history
RWL vs SPYV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWL
- SPYV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWL 11.4%, betterSPYV 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWL 1.46, betterSPYV 1.17
- Worst fall
- RWL −17.5%, betterSPYV −17.9%
- Market sensitivity
- RWL 0.78SPYV 0.83
RWL and SPYV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

