RWM ranks 4th and SKRE 50th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs SKRE
SKRE −0.20pt a year
0.95%0.75%
RWM 779.6×the volume
30M38.5K
RWM vs SKRE Performance
−10.2%−39.3%
- RWM 0.95%
- SKRE 0.75%, better
- RWM $163M
- SKRE $5M
- RWM −10.2%, better
- SKRE −39.3%
- RWM 3.32%, better
- SKRE 0.35%
- RWM 3
- SKRE 2
- RWM 30M sh, better
- SKRE 38.5K sh
- RWM $14.37
- SKRE $6.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | SKRE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | D25 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and SKRE are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
SKRED
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SKRE Regional banks got their own wrecking ball. SKRE aims to deliver 2x the inverse of KRE's daily move in a single ticker, and it charges well under what the average leveraged bear fund asks.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
SKRE The Fund seeks to deliver daily inverse leveraged performance relative to the KRE ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs SKRE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs SKRE Cost
Overpaying RWM vs SKRE
$3,387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
SKRE 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | SKRE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,336 | $342 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,078 | $1,244 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $14,482 | $3,387 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.75%SKRE, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
SKRE 3rd cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs SKRE Dividends
- RWM 3.32%, better
- SKRE 0.35%
- RWM $0.48
- SKRE $0.02
- RWM $0.09
- SKRE $0.02
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- SKRE Dec 24, 2025
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- SKRE Dec 26, 2025
- RWM Quarterly
- SKRE Annual
Distribution history
RWM vs SKRE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%SKRE 41.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99SKRE −1.05
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%SKRE −79.5%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23SKRE −1.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.