RWM ranks 4th and SSG 27th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs SSG
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 40.8×the volume
33.1M813K
RWM +48.7pt
−10.9%−59.6%
RWM vs SSG Performance
−14.5%−99.1%
- RWM 0.95%
- SSG 0.95%
- RWM $202M
- SSG $50M
- RWM −13.0%, better
- SSG −49.6%
- RWM 3.36%
- SSG 5.65%, better
- RWM 3
- SSG 2
- RWM 33.1M sh, better
- SSG 813K sh
- RWM $14.66
- SSG $16.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | B56Higher | C44 |
| Durability | A70Higher | B63 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and SSG are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
SSGC
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SSG Chip stocks cut both ways. SSG is ProShares' -2x daily short on the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index, built one trading day at a time and live since 2007. Fee: 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.33% gross).
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
SSG The fund targets daily, pre-fee and pre-expense returns that are twice the opposite of the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors SM Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs SSG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs SSG Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
SSG 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.95%SSG
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SSG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs SSG Dividends
- RWM 3.36%
- SSG 5.65%, better
- RWM $0.48
- SSG $0.89
- RWM $0.09
- SSG $0.14
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- SSG Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- SSG Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- SSG Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs SSG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWM
- SSG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterSSG 56.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99, betterSSG −2.03
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%, betterSSG −99.7%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.11SSG −3.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.