RWM ranks 4th and TSXD 52nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs TSXD
RWM −0.04pt a year
0.95%0.99%
RWM 534.1×the volume
30M56.2K
RWM vs TSXD Performance
−10.2%−63.4%
- RWM 0.95%, better
- TSXD 0.99%
- RWM $163M
- TSXD $1M
- RWM −10.2%, better
- TSXD −63.4%
- RWM 3.32%
- TSXD
- RWM 3
- TSXD 3
- RWM 30M sh, better
- TSXD 56.2K sh
- RWM $14.37
- TSXD $5.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | TSXD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | F15 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and TSXD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
TSXDD
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
TSXD The inverse half of Direxion's Titans line: TSXD aims for -200% of the daily move in an equal-weight basket of the five biggest semiconductor names. Narrower than shorting the whole sector, broader than betting against one chip stock.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
TSXD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to -200% of the performance of the NYSE Semiconductor Top 5 Equal Weight Index, before fees and expenses. Its objective applies for a single day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs TSXD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs TSXD Cost
Overpaying TSXD vs RWM
$656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
TSXD 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | TSXD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,746 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,565 | $243 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,525 | $656 |
- 0.95%RWM, cheaper
- 0.99%TSXD
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
TSXD 49th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs TSXD Dividends
- RWM 3.32%
- TSXD
- RWM $0.48
- TSXD
- RWM $0.09
- TSXD $0.06
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- TSXD Sep 22, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- TSXD Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- TSXD Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs TSXD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%TSXD 74.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99TSXD −0.97
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%TSXD −81.1%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23TSXD −3.62
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.