RWM ranks 4th and TTXD 52nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs TTXD
RWM −0.07pt a year
0.95%1.02%
RWM 2730.5×the volume
33.1M12.1K
RWM vs TTXD Performance
−13.0%−41.2%
- RWM 0.95%, better
- TTXD 1.02%
- RWM $202M
- TTXD $1M
- RWM −13.0%, better
- TTXD −41.2%
- RWM 3.36%
- TTXD
- RWM 3
- TTXD 3
- RWM 33.1M sh, better
- TTXD 12.1K sh
- RWM $14.66
- TTXD $15.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | TTXD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | F22 |
| Holdings | B56 | |
| Durability | A70Higher | F12 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and TTXD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
TTXDD
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
TTXD Most inverse tech funds short a whole index. TTXD points at five: the largest US information technology stocks, equal weighted, at 200% of their inverse move each day. A scalpel where the shelf mostly stocks blunt instruments.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
TTXD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the inverse performance of the S&P 500 Information Technology (Sector) Top 5 Equal Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs TTXD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs TTXD Cost
Overpaying TTXD vs RWM
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
TTXD 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | TTXD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,797 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,746 | $424 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $19,012 | $1,143 |
- 0.95%RWM, cheaper
- 1.02%TTXD
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
TTXD 51st cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs TTXD Dividends
- RWM 3.36%
- TTXD
- RWM $0.48
- TTXD
- RWM $0.09
- TTXD $0.24
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- TTXD Sep 22, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- TTXD Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- TTXD Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs TTXD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%TTXD 63.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99TTXD −0.47
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%TTXD −72.7%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.11TTXD −3.76
RWM and TTXD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
