RWM ranks 4th and ZVOL 13th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs ZVOL
RWM −0.47pt a year
0.95%1.42%
RWM 435.4×the volume
33.1M76.1K
ZVOL +21.7pt
−14.3%+7.4%
RWM vs ZVOL Performance
−13.0%+23.4%
- RWM 0.95%, better
- ZVOL 1.42%
- RWM $202M
- ZVOL $21M
- RWM −13.0%
- ZVOL +23.4%, better
- RWM 3.36%
- ZVOL 82.91%, better
- RWM 3
- ZVOL 1
- RWM 33.1M sh, better
- ZVOL 76.1K sh
- RWM $14.66
- ZVOL $6.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | ZVOL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | B56 | |
| Durability | A70Higher | C48 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and ZVOL are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
ZVOLB
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
ZVOL Short volatility, but further out the curve. ZVOL takes daily inverse exposure to mid-term VIX futures instead of the front month, aiming to monetize the roll premium in those contracts, and it pays out monthly.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
ZVOL The Fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Inverse Daily Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs ZVOL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs ZVOL Cost
Overpaying ZVOL vs RWM
$7,268
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
ZVOL 1.42%
$25,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | ZVOL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $2,460 | $782 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $9,074 | $2,752 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $25,137 | $7,268 |
- 0.95%RWM, cheaper
- 1.42%ZVOL
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
ZVOL 52nd cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs ZVOL Dividends
- RWM 3.36%
- ZVOL 82.91%, better
- RWM $0.48
- ZVOL $5.82
- RWM $0.09
- ZVOL $0.49
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- ZVOL Oct 21, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- ZVOL Oct 22, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- ZVOL Monthly
Distribution history
RWM vs ZVOL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterZVOL 21.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99ZVOL 0.37, better
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%ZVOL −37.2%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.11ZVOL 1.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.