SPSM ranks 1st and RZG 10th of 13 funds in the S&P SmallCap 600 Category.
RZG vs SPSM
SPSM −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SPSM 153.2×the volume
11.2K1.72M
SPSM +1.3pt
+9.3%+10.6%
RZG vs SPSM Performance
+16.7%+34.7%
- RZG 0.35%
- SPSM 0.03%, better
- RZG $118M
- SPSM $16.2B
- RZG +16.2%
- SPSM +20.7%, better
- RZG 0.58%
- SPSM 1.51%, better
- RZG 128
- SPSM 607
- RZG 11.2K sh
- SPSM 1.72M sh, better
- RZG $62.23
- SPSM $55.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RZG | SPSM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A94Higher | A84 |
| Risk | D36 | C50Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | A86Higher |
| Durability | D33 | A77Higher |
Rank among S&P SmallCap 600 funds
Same Category. RZG and SPSM are both graded against the same 13 S&P SmallCap 600 funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RZGC
SPSMA
In short
RZG Small-cap growth with no fence-sitters: RZG holds only the S&P 600 names that score strongest on growth, about 130 of them, weighted by growth score instead of size. A 2006-vintage purist in a cap-weighted world.
SPSM The bargain-rack version of a small-cap classic. SPSM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 for 0.03% a year, one of the thinnest fees in US equities, and holds roughly 600 smaller American companies.
Stated mandate
RZG The Fund is based on the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index and invests at least 90% of total assets in securities using a rules-based approach, with no company exceeding a 5% weighting.
SPSM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RZG vs SPSM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RZG vs SPSM Cost
Overpaying RZG vs SPSM
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RZG 0.35%
$7,126
SPSM 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RZG | SPSM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%RZG
- 0.03%SPSM, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P SmallCap 600 funds
- Median 0.15%
SPSM cheapest of 13 funds
RZG 10th cheapest of 13 funds
RZG vs SPSM Dividends
- RZG 0.58%
- SPSM 1.51%, better
- RZG $0.36
- SPSM $0.82
- RZG $0.11
- SPSM $0.22
- RZG Sep 21, 2026
- SPSM Sep 21, 2026
- RZG Sep 25, 2026
- SPSM Sep 23, 2026
- RZG Quarterly
- SPSM Quarterly
Distribution history
RZG vs SPSM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RZG
- SPSM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RZG 20.1%SPSM 18.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RZG 0.72SPSM 0.76, better
- Worst fall
- RZG −38.3%SPSM −27.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RZG 1.15SPSM 1.04
RZG and SPSM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

