SCHE ranks 2nd and XCNY 4th of 5 funds in the Emerging Markets Total Market Category.
SCHE vs XCNY
SCHE −0.13pt a year
0.06%0.19%
SCHE 5732.7×the volume
3.11M543
SCHE vs XCNY Performance
+3.8%+14.0%
- SCHE 0.06%, better
- XCNY 0.19%
- SCHE $12.1B
- XCNY $10M
- SCHE +3.8%
- XCNY +14.0%, better
- SCHE 2.79%, better
- XCNY 2.38%
- SCHE 2224
- XCNY 1195
- SCHE 3.11M sh, better
- XCNY 543 sh
- SCHE $34.30
- XCNY $32.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHE | XCNY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C50 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | F12 |
| Holdings | D37 | C51Higher |
| Durability | B55Higher | F24 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Total Market funds
Same Category. SCHE and XCNY are both graded against the same 5 Emerging Markets Total Market funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHEA
XCNYC
In short
SCHE Emerging markets for six basis points. Schwab's tracker spreads roughly 2,200 stocks across FTSE's emerging universe at well under the typical fee in its group, and it has been running the same play since 2010.
XCNY Emerging markets with China removed, and unusually, small caps left in. XCNY tracks an S&P broad-market index of roughly 1,200 large, mid and small-cap companies across emerging economies, none of them China-domiciled.
Stated mandate
SCHE The fund seeks to track the total return of the FTSE Emerging Index, before fees and expenses.
XCNY The fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance of the S&P Emerging Ex-China BMI.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHE vs XCNY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHE vs XCNY Cost
Overpaying XCNY vs SCHE
$2,682
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHE 0.06%
$1,270
XCNY 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHE | XCNY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $347 | $237 |
| 20 | $432 | $1,351 | $919 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $3,952 | $2,682 |
- 0.06%SCHE, cheaper
- 0.19%XCNY
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Total Market funds
- Median 0.07%
SCHE cheapest of 5 funds
XCNY 4th cheapest of 5 funds
SCHE vs XCNY Dividends
- SCHE 2.79%, better
- XCNY 2.38%
- SCHE $0.95
- XCNY $0.75
- SCHE $0.04
- XCNY $0.28
- SCHE Jun 24, 2026
- XCNY Jun 22, 2026
- SCHE Jun 29, 2026
- XCNY Jun 26, 2026
- SCHE Twice a year
- XCNY Twice a year
Distribution history
SCHE vs XCNY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHE 11.8%XCNY 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHE 1.05XCNY 0.58
- Worst fall
- SCHE −30.3%XCNY −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHE 0.87XCNY 0.77
SCHE and XCNY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
