SPEM ranks 3rd and XCNY 4th of 5 funds in the Emerging Markets Total Market Category.
SPEM vs XCNY
SPEM −0.12pt a year
0.07%0.19%
SPEM 3189.6×the volume
1.73M543
SPEM vs XCNY Performance
+4.6%+14.0%
- SPEM 0.07%, better
- XCNY 0.19%
- SPEM $16.4B
- XCNY $10M
- SPEM +4.6%
- XCNY +14.0%, better
- SPEM 2.68%, better
- XCNY 2.38%
- SPEM 2699
- XCNY 1195
- SPEM 1.73M sh, better
- XCNY 543 sh
- SPEM $49.23
- XCNY $32.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SPEM | XCNY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C48 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | B58Higher | F12 |
| Holdings | A79Higher | C51 |
| Durability | B69Higher | F24 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Total Market funds
Same Category. SPEM and XCNY are both graded against the same 5 Emerging Markets Total Market funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SPEMB
XCNYC
In short
SPEM Emerging markets, whole hog: roughly 3,000 large, mid and small caps from the S&P Emerging BMI at 0.07% a year. State Street's cheap-beta workhorse in the developing world, running since 2007.
XCNY Emerging markets with China removed, and unusually, small caps left in. XCNY tracks an S&P broad-market index of roughly 1,200 large, mid and small-cap companies across emerging economies, none of them China-domiciled.
Stated mandate
SPEM The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return of the S&P Emerging BMI Index. It provides broad exposure to emerging-market equities across large-, mid-, and small-cap companies.
XCNY The fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance of the S&P Emerging Ex-China BMI.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPEM vs XCNY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPEM vs XCNY Cost
Overpaying XCNY vs SPEM
$2,472
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPEM 0.07%
$1,480
XCNY 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPEM | XCNY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $347 | $219 |
| 20 | $503 | $1,351 | $848 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $3,952 | $2,472 |
- 0.07%SPEM, cheaper
- 0.19%XCNY
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Total Market funds
- Median 0.07%
SPEM 3rd cheapest of 5 funds
XCNY 4th cheapest of 5 funds
SPEM vs XCNY Dividends
- SPEM 2.68%, better
- XCNY 2.38%
- SPEM $1.30
- XCNY $0.75
- SPEM $0.53
- XCNY $0.28
- SPEM Jun 22, 2026
- XCNY Jun 22, 2026
- SPEM Jun 26, 2026
- XCNY Jun 26, 2026
- SPEM Twice a year
- XCNY Twice a year
Distribution history
SPEM vs XCNY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPEM 12.1%XCNY 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- SPEM 1.03XCNY 0.58
- Worst fall
- SPEM −29.2%XCNY −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- SPEM 0.86XCNY 0.77
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.