VWO ranks 1st and XCNY 4th of 5 funds in the Emerging Markets Total Market Category.
VWO vs XCNY
VWO −0.13pt a year
0.06%0.19%
VWO 13439.0×the volume
7.3M543
VWO vs XCNY Performance
+3.3%+14.0%
- VWO 0.06%, better
- XCNY 0.19%
- VWO $165B
- XCNY $10M
- VWO +3.3%
- XCNY +14.0%, better
- VWO 2.19%
- XCNY 2.38%, better
- VWO 5015
- XCNY 1195
- VWO 7.3M sh, better
- XCNY 543 sh
- VWO $55.50
- XCNY $32.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VWO | XCNY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C48 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | F12 |
| Holdings | B58Higher | C51 |
| Durability | A86Higher | F24 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Total Market funds
Same Category. VWO and XCNY are both graded against the same 5 Emerging Markets Total Market funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VWOA
XCNYC
In short
VWO Emerging markets the FTSE way: no South Korea (FTSE grades it developed), Chinese A-shares in the mix, small caps riding along, all for six basis points.
XCNY Emerging markets with China removed, and unusually, small caps left in. XCNY tracks an S&P broad-market index of roughly 1,200 large, mid and small-cap companies across emerging economies, none of them China-domiciled.
Stated mandate
VWO The fund seeks to track the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index through passive index sampling, investing in a broadly diversified portfolio of emerging-market equities.
XCNY The fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance of the S&P Emerging Ex-China BMI.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VWO vs XCNY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VWO vs XCNY Cost
Overpaying XCNY vs VWO
$2,682
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VWO 0.06%
$1,270
XCNY 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VWO | XCNY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $347 | $237 |
| 20 | $432 | $1,351 | $919 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $3,952 | $2,682 |
- 0.06%VWO, cheaper
- 0.19%XCNY
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Total Market funds
- Median 0.07%
VWO cheapest of 5 funds
XCNY 4th cheapest of 5 funds
VWO vs XCNY Dividends
- VWO 2.19%
- XCNY 2.38%, better
- VWO $1.22
- XCNY $0.75
- VWO $0.11
- XCNY $0.28
- VWO Sep 18, 2026
- XCNY Jun 22, 2026
- VWO Sep 22, 2026
- XCNY Jun 26, 2026
- VWO Quarterly
- XCNY Twice a year
Distribution history
VWO vs XCNY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VWO 12.0%XCNY 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- VWO 0.99XCNY 0.58
- Worst fall
- VWO −29.9%XCNY −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- VWO 0.78XCNY 0.77
VWO and XCNY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





