SCHG ranks 2nd and VOT 7th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
SCHG vs VOT
SCHG −0.01pt a year
0.04%0.05%
SCHG 37.2×the volume
7.59M204K
SCHG +6.9pt
+18.5%+11.6%
SCHG vs VOT Performance
+74.3%+15.5%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- VOT 0.05%
- SCHG $61.7B
- VOT $33.2B
- SCHG +3.3%, better
- VOT −1.2%
- SCHG 0.40%
- VOT 0.62%, better
- SCHG 187
- VOT 123
- SCHG 7.59M sh, better
- VOT 204K sh
- SCHG $34.31
- VOT $286.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHG | VOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A92 | A97Higher |
| Risk | C41 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | A87Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | D36 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. SCHG and VOT are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHGA
VOTA
In short
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
VOT Mid-caps are the market's forgotten middle: too big for small-cap funds, too small for the S&P 500. VOT buys the growth half of that gap for five basis points, a fraction of what the typical factor fund charges.
Stated mandate
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
VOT The ETF is designed to follow the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, a passive benchmark for U.S. mid-capitalization growth companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHG vs VOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHG vs VOT Cost
Overpaying VOT vs SCHG
$211
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHG 0.04%
$849
VOT 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHG | VOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $92 | $19 |
| 20 | $288 | $360 | $72 |
| 30 | $849 | $1,060 | $211 |
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- 0.05%VOT
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
VOT 5th cheapest of 35 funds
SCHG vs VOT Dividends
- SCHG 0.40%
- VOT 0.62%, better
- SCHG $0.14
- VOT $1.78
- SCHG $0.04
- VOT $0.39
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- VOT Sep 28, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- VOT Sep 30, 2026
- SCHG Quarterly
- VOT Quarterly
Distribution history
SCHG vs VOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHG
- VOT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHG 16.5%, betterVOT 16.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHG 1.16, betterVOT 0.75
- Worst fall
- SCHG −34.6%, betterVOT −37.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHG 1.20VOT 1.16
SCHG and VOT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

