SCHG ranks 2nd and VTWG 14th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
SCHG vs VTWG
SCHG −0.02pt a year
0.04%0.06%
SCHG 361.3×the volume
7.59M21K
SCHG +8.0pt
+18.5%+10.5%
SCHG vs VTWG Performance
+74.3%+18.8%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- VTWG 0.06%
- SCHG $61.7B
- VTWG $1.6B
- SCHG +3.3%
- VTWG +7.1%, better
- SCHG 0.40%
- VTWG 0.68%, better
- SCHG 187
- VTWG 1138
- SCHG 7.59M sh, better
- VTWG 21K sh
- SCHG $34.31
- VTWG $257.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHG | VTWG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A92Higher | A91 |
| Risk | C41Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | D36 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | A72 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. SCHG and VTWG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHGA
VTWGB
In short
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
VTWG Vanguard's Russell 2000 Growth tracker holds the index in full, roughly 1,100 small-cap names, for six basis points. Most of the top-rated growth ETFs crowd into mega-caps. This one stays where the small companies are.
Stated mandate
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
VTWG The fund seeks to track the Russell 2000 Growth Index, which represents small-capitalization U.S. growth stocks. It uses passive full replication.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHG vs VTWG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHG vs VTWG Cost
Overpaying VTWG vs SCHG
$421
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHG 0.04%
$849
VTWG 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHG | VTWG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $110 | $37 |
| 20 | $288 | $432 | $144 |
| 30 | $849 | $1,270 | $421 |
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- 0.06%VTWG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
VTWG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
SCHG vs VTWG Dividends
- SCHG 0.40%
- VTWG 0.68%, better
- SCHG $0.14
- VTWG $1.75
- SCHG $0.04
- VTWG $0.34
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- VTWG Sep 23, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- VTWG Sep 25, 2026
- SCHG Quarterly
- VTWG Quarterly
Distribution history
SCHG vs VTWG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHG
- VTWG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHG 16.5%, betterVTWG 20.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHG 1.16, betterVTWG 0.78
- Worst fall
- SCHG −34.6%, betterVTWG −40.5%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHG 1.20VTWG 1.43
SCHG and VTWG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

