IMCG ranks 2nd and VTWG 14th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs VTWG
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.06%0.06%
IMCG 6.3×the volume
132K21K
IMCG +3.8pt
+14.3%+10.5%
IMCG vs VTWG Performance
+30.8%+18.8%
- IMCG 0.06%
- VTWG 0.06%
- IMCG $4.04B
- VTWG $1.6B
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- VTWG +7.1%
- IMCG 0.67%
- VTWG 0.68%, better
- IMCG 262
- VTWG 1138
- IMCG 132K sh, better
- VTWG 21K sh
- IMCG $93.24
- VTWG $257.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | VTWG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A78 |
| Mission | A95Higher | A91 |
| Risk | A78Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A75 | A85Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A72Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and VTWG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
VTWGB
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
VTWG Vanguard's Russell 2000 Growth tracker holds the index in full, roughly 1,100 small-cap names, for six basis points. Most of the top-rated growth ETFs crowd into mega-caps. This one stays where the small companies are.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
VTWG The fund seeks to track the Russell 2000 Growth Index, which represents small-capitalization U.S. growth stocks. It uses passive full replication.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs VTWG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs VTWG Cost
Same expense ratio
$1,270
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
VTWG 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | VTWG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $110 |
| 20 | $432 | $432 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $1,270 |
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.06%VTWG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
VTWG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs VTWG Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%
- VTWG 0.68%, better
- IMCG $0.62
- VTWG $1.75
- IMCG $0.19
- VTWG $0.34
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- VTWG Sep 23, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- VTWG Sep 25, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- VTWG Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs VTWG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- VTWG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%, betterVTWG 20.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97, betterVTWG 0.78
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%, betterVTWG −40.5%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14VTWG 1.43
IMCG and VTWG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

