SCHK ranks 2nd and VOTE 4th of 42 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
SCHK vs VOTE
SCHK −0.02pt a year
0.03%0.05%
SCHK 56.2×the volume
1.31M23.4K
VOTE +0.4pt
+11.3%+11.7%
SCHK vs VOTE Performance
+70.5%+74.0%
- SCHK 0.03%, better
- VOTE 0.05%
- SCHK $5.69B
- VOTE $1.11B
- SCHK +11.8%
- VOTE +11.8%
- SCHK 1.05%, better
- VOTE 0.94%
- SCHK 999
- VOTE 506
- SCHK 1.31M sh, better
- VOTE 23.4K sh
- SCHK $36.31
- VOTE $89.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHK | VOTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | A91 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | B57Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B68Higher | B56 |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. SCHK and VOTE are both graded against the same 42 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHKA
VOTEA
In short
SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.
VOTE An index fund with a second job. VOTE holds roughly 500 of the largest US companies at a 0.05% fee, then uses its proxy ballots and meetings with management to push for change instead of screening companies out.
Stated mandate
SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.
VOTE The fund seeks to track a market-cap-weighted index of the 500 largest U.S. public companies. It is designed as low-cost core U.S. market exposure, with proxy voting and company engagement intended to encourage transformational change.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHK vs VOTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHK vs VOTE Cost
Overpaying VOTE vs SCHK
$422
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHK 0.03%
$638
VOTE 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHK | VOTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $92 | $37 |
| 20 | $216 | $360 | $144 |
| 30 | $638 | $1,060 | $422 |
- 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
- 0.05%VOTE
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
SCHK cheapest of 42 funds
VOTE 4th cheapest of 42 funds
SCHK vs VOTE Dividends
- SCHK 1.05%, better
- VOTE 0.94%
- SCHK $0.38
- VOTE $0.83
- SCHK $0.10
- VOTE $0.23
- SCHK Sep 23, 2026
- VOTE Sep 22, 2026
- SCHK Sep 28, 2026
- VOTE Sep 24, 2026
- SCHK Quarterly
- VOTE Quarterly
Distribution history
SCHK vs VOTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHK
- VOTE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHK 12.6%, betterVOTE 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHK 1.39VOTE 1.40, better
- Worst fall
- SCHK −25.4%, betterVOTE −25.7%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHK 1.02VOTE 1.02Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.