SCHZ ranks 2nd and TOTL 66th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
SCHZ vs TOTL
SCHZ −0.52pt a year
0.03%0.55%
SCHZ 3.6×the volume
2.37M651K
TOTL +0.2pt
+1.2%+1.4%
SCHZ vs TOTL Performance
−1.0%+2.0%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- TOTL 0.55%
- SCHZ $10.8B
- TOTL $3.74B
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- TOTL −0.8%
- SCHZ 4.27%
- TOTL 5.47%, better
- SCHZ 12610
- TOTL 1648
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- TOTL 651K sh
- SCHZ $22.54
- TOTL $38.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHZ | TOTL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F13 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A88Higher | A85 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. SCHZ and TOTL are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHZA
TOTLB
In short
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
TOTL Most core bond ETFs clone the Agg and call it a day. TOTL hires a manager to trade around it instead: actively managed, benchmarked to the Bloomberg US Aggregate, and on the tape since 2015.
Stated mandate
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
TOTL The fund seeks to maximize total return through actively managed core fixed-income exposure benchmarked to the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHZ vs TOTL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHZ vs TOTL Cost
Overpaying TOTL vs SCHZ
$10,266
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
TOTL 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHZ | TOTL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $988 | $933 |
| 20 | $216 | $3,790 | $3,574 |
| 30 | $638 | $10,904 | $10,266 |
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- 0.55%TOTL
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
TOTL 97th cheapest of 114 funds
SCHZ vs TOTL Dividends
- SCHZ 4.27%
- TOTL 5.47%, better
- SCHZ $0.96
- TOTL $2.09
- SCHZ $0.08
- TOTL $0.18
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- TOTL Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- TOTL Oct 6, 2026
- SCHZ Monthly
- TOTL Monthly
Distribution history
SCHZ vs TOTL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHZ
- TOTL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHZ 5.6%TOTL 5.6%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHZ 0.17TOTL 0.25, better
- Worst fall
- SCHZ −17.5%TOTL −15.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SCHZ 0.99TOTL 0.98
SCHZ and TOTL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
