XHLF ranks 4th and SCUB 64th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
SCUB vs XHLF
XHLF −0.27pt a year
0.30%0.03%
XHLF 74.3×the volume
4.16K309K
SCUB vs XHLF Performance
+1.0%+0.9%
- SCUB 0.30%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- SCUB $29M
- XHLF $2.03B
- SCUB
- XHLF +3.6%
- SCUB
- XHLF 3.75%
- SCUB 147
- XHLF 29
- SCUB 4.16K sh
- XHLF 309K sh, better
- SCUB $25.02
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCUB | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B60Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | F8 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D35 |
| Durability | F15 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. SCUB and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCUBC
XHLFA
In short
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCUB vs XHLF Holdings
How SCUB and XHLF differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country75.7%
Sector
No Sector split for SCUB and XHLF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SCUBMore in XHLF | SCUB | XHLF |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | XHLF +24.3 points | 75.7% | 100.0% |
| Cayman Islands | SCUB +20.0 points | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | SCUB +3.2 points | 3.2% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | SCUB +0.7 points | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Bermuda | SCUB +0.4 points | 0.4% | 0.0% |
Outside the US: SCUB 16% developed, 84% emerging.
Concentration
- SCUB15.4%
- XHLF79.1%
- SCUB146
- XHLF29
Asset class
- SCUB
- Fixed Income
- XHLF
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. SCUB holds 146 securities, XHLF 29.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCUB vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying SCUB vs XHLF
$5,511
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCUB 0.30%
$6,149
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCUB | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $55 | $490 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $216 | $1,897 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $638 | $5,511 |
- 0.30%SCUB
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
SCUB 69th cheapest of 78 funds
SCUB vs XHLF Dividends
- SCUB
- XHLF 3.75%
- SCUB
- XHLF $1.89
- SCUB $0.09
- XHLF $0.15
- SCUB Oct 1, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- SCUB Oct 5, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- SCUB Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
SCUB vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCUB XHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCUB XHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- SCUB XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SCUB 0.02XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.