SCYB ranks 1st and SJNK 15th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
SCYB vs SJNK
SCYB −0.37pt a year
0.03%0.40%
SJNK 2.7×the volume
1.14M3.1M
SCYB +0.7pt
+7.9%+7.2%
SCYB vs SJNK Performance
+2.6%+2.3%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- SJNK 0.40%
- SCYB $2.73B
- SJNK $4.34B
- SCYB +2.6%, better
- SJNK +2.3%
- SCYB 7.16%
- SJNK 7.19%, better
- SCYB 1838
- SJNK 1117
- SCYB 1.14M sh
- SJNK 3.1M sh, better
- SCYB $25.18
- SJNK $24.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCYB | SJNK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B58 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B60Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | B68 |
| Holdings | A99Higher | A91 |
| Durability | B68 | A88Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. SCYB and SJNK are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCYBA
SJNKA
In short
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
SJNK Junk bonds with the long end lopped off. SJNK tracks an index of US high yield corporate bonds maturing within five years, keeping the credit risk while shedding much of the rate risk. Trading since 2012, paying monthly.
Stated mandate
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
SJNK The fund seeks to track the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index, which measures the performance of short-term, U.S. dollar-denominated high yield corporate bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCYB vs SJNK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCYB vs SJNK Cost
Overpaying SJNK vs SCYB
$7,452
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCYB 0.03%
$638
SJNK 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCYB | SJNK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $723 | $668 |
| 20 | $216 | $2,793 | $2,577 |
| 30 | $638 | $8,090 | $7,452 |
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- 0.40%SJNK
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
SJNK 37th cheapest of 84 funds
SCYB vs SJNK Dividends
- SCYB 7.16%
- SJNK 7.19%, better
- SCYB $1.81
- SJNK $1.74
- SCYB $0.16
- SJNK $0.15
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- SJNK Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- SJNK Nov 5, 2026
- SCYB Monthly
- SJNK Monthly
Distribution history
SCYB vs SJNK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCYB 4.6%SJNK 3.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCYB 0.82, betterSJNK 0.81
- Worst fall
- SCYB −4.9%SJNK −10.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SCYB 0.28SJNK 0.47
SCYB and SJNK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
