SCYB ranks 1st and TFLR 72nd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
SCYB vs TFLR
SCYB −0.58pt a year
0.03%0.61%
SCYB 9.3×the volume
1.1M119K
SCYB +1.1pt
+8.4%+7.3%
SCYB vs TFLR Performance
+2.0%+4.0%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- TFLR 0.61%
- SCYB $2.8B
- TFLR $886M
- SCYB +2.0%
- TFLR +4.0%, better
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- TFLR 6.55%
- SCYB 1844
- TFLR 386
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- TFLR 119K sh
- SCYB $25.22
- TFLR $49.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCYB | TFLR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F15 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F9 |
| Risk | B59 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A99Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B68Higher | B66 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. SCYB and TFLR are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCYBA
TFLRD
In short
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
TFLR A floating-rate outlier in a fixed-coupon crowd. T. Rowe's bank-loan ETF keeps at least 80% of net assets in loans and debt whose coupons reset with short-term rates, most of it below investment grade.
Stated mandate
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
TFLR The fund seeks high current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCYB vs TFLR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCYB vs TFLR Cost
Overpaying TFLR vs SCYB
$11,360
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCYB 0.03%
$638
TFLR 0.61%
$11,998
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCYB | TFLR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $1,093 | $1,038 |
| 20 | $216 | $4,181 | $3,965 |
| 30 | $638 | $11,998 | $11,360 |
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- 0.61%TFLR
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
TFLR 72nd cheapest of 84 funds
SCYB vs TFLR Dividends
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- TFLR 6.55%
- SCYB $1.80
- TFLR $3.28
- SCYB $0.16
- TFLR $0.29
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- TFLR Oct 27, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- TFLR Oct 29, 2026
- SCYB Monthly
- TFLR Monthly
Distribution history
SCYB vs TFLR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCYB 4.6%TFLR 2.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCYB 0.82TFLR 1.24, better
- Worst fall
- SCYB −4.9%TFLR −4.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SCYB 0.28TFLR 0.05
SCYB and TFLR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
