SCYB ranks 1st and THYF 54th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
SCYB vs THYF
SCYB −0.47pt a year
0.03%0.50%
SCYB 63.4×the volume
1.1M17.4K
THYF +0.3pt
+8.4%+8.7%
SCYB vs THYF Performance
+2.0%+2.2%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- THYF 0.50%
- SCYB $2.8B
- THYF $831M
- SCYB +2.0%
- THYF +2.2%, better
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- THYF 6.93%
- SCYB 1844
- THYF 103
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- THYF 17.4K sh
- SCYB $25.22
- THYF $49.61
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCYB | THYF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D35 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | B59Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | A99Higher | D34 |
| Durability | B68Higher | B66 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. SCYB and THYF are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCYBA
THYFC
In short
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
THYF T. Rowe Price sends its credit desk into junk-bond territory: roughly 100 hand-picked issues chasing total return first and income second, in a corner of the market ruled by index trackers holding thousands.
Stated mandate
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
THYF The fund seeks total return and, secondarily, current income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCYB vs THYF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCYB vs THYF Cost
Overpaying THYF vs SCYB
$9,341
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCYB 0.03%
$638
THYF 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCYB | THYF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $900 | $845 |
| 20 | $216 | $3,460 | $3,244 |
| 30 | $638 | $9,979 | $9,341 |
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- 0.50%THYF
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
THYF 55th cheapest of 84 funds
SCYB vs THYF Dividends
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- THYF 6.93%
- SCYB $1.80
- THYF $3.46
- SCYB $0.16
- THYF $0.29
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- THYF Oct 27, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- THYF Oct 29, 2026
- SCYB Monthly
- THYF Monthly
Distribution history
SCYB vs THYF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCYB 4.6%, betterTHYF 4.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCYB 0.82THYF 0.87, better
- Worst fall
- SCYB −4.9%THYF −5.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SCYB 0.28THYF 0.58
SCYB and THYF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
