SCYB ranks 1st and ZTOP 37th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
SCYB vs ZTOP
SCYB −0.36pt a year
0.03%0.39%
SCYB 1549.0×the volume
1.14M736
SCYB vs ZTOP Performance
+2.6%+2.7%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- ZTOP 0.39%
- SCYB $2.73B
- ZTOP $16M
- SCYB +2.6%
- ZTOP +2.7%, better
- SCYB 7.16%, better
- ZTOP 6.39%
- SCYB 1838
- ZTOP 101
- SCYB 1.14M sh, better
- ZTOP 736 sh
- SCYB $25.18
- ZTOP $50.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCYB | ZTOP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B58 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B60 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A79Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A99Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B68Higher | D31 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. SCYB and ZTOP are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCYBA
ZTOPB
In short
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
ZTOP Most junk-bond funds sample the whole market. This one holds only the 100 largest, most liquid US high-yield issuers, weights them equally, and reshuffles monthly. A quality screen, not a market cross-section.
Stated mandate
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
ZTOP The Fund seeks before-fee-and-expense results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Top 100 Quality Select Equal Weighted Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCYB vs ZTOP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCYB vs ZTOP Cost
Overpaying ZTOP vs SCYB
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCYB 0.03%
$638
ZTOP 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCYB | ZTOP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $705 | $650 |
| 20 | $216 | $2,725 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $638 | $7,898 | $7,260 |
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- 0.39%ZTOP
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
ZTOP 31st cheapest of 84 funds
SCYB vs ZTOP Dividends
- SCYB 7.16%, better
- ZTOP 6.39%
- SCYB $1.81
- ZTOP $3.21
- SCYB $0.16
- ZTOP $0.27
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- ZTOP Oct 16, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- ZTOP Oct 19, 2026
- SCYB Monthly
- ZTOP Monthly
Distribution history
SCYB vs ZTOP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCYB 4.6%ZTOP 3.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCYB 0.82ZTOP 0.22
- Worst fall
- SCYB −4.9%ZTOP −2.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SCYB 0.28ZTOP 0.17
SCYB and ZTOP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
