SCZ ranks 2nd and TISC 13th of 16 funds in the International Small-Cap Category.
SCZ vs TISC
SCZ −0.15pt a year
0.40%0.55%
SCZ 33.3×the volume
1.3M39.1K
SCZ vs TISC Performance
−1.4%−1.0%
- SCZ 0.40%, better
- TISC 0.55%
- SCZ $12.7B
- TISC $115M
- SCZ +12.2%
- TISC
- SCZ 3.22%
- TISC
- SCZ 2039
- TISC 608
- SCZ 1.3M sh, better
- TISC 39.1K sh
- SCZ $82.65
- TISC $23.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCZ | TISC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D33 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | A92Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D33 |
| Durability | A85Higher | D29 |
Rank among International Small-Cap funds
Same Category. SCZ and TISC are both graded against the same 16 International Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCZA
TISCD
In short
SCZ The purist's take on foreign small caps: developed markets only, outside the US and Canada. Trading since 2007, SCZ follows the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, so Japan, Europe and Australia are in and emerging markets stay out.
TISC Most international small-cap ETFs just track an index. TISC goes the other way: Thrivent's own managers pick developed-market small caps outside the US, spread across roughly 600 names in growth, value and core styles.
Stated mandate
SCZ The fund seeks to track an index of small-cap equities from developed markets outside the United States and Canada, providing international diversification and exposure to overseas small-cap stocks.
TISC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCZ vs TISC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCZ vs TISC Cost
Overpaying TISC vs SCZ
$2,814
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCZ 0.40%
$8,090
TISC 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCZ | TISC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $988 | $265 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $3,790 | $997 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $10,904 | $2,814 |
- 0.40%SCZ, cheaper
- 0.55%TISC
- Middle half of International Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.44%
SCZ 6th cheapest of 16 funds
TISC 11th cheapest of 16 funds
SCZ vs TISC Dividends
- SCZ 3.22%
- TISC
- SCZ $2.67
- TISC None
- SCZ $1.17
- TISC
- SCZ Jun 15, 2026
- TISC
- SCZ Jun 18, 2026
- TISC
- SCZ Twice a year
- TISC
Distribution history
SCZ vs TISC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCZ 13.6%TISC
- Return per unit of risk
- SCZ 1.04TISC
- Worst fall
- SCZ −35.5%TISC
- Market sensitivity
- SCZ 1.00TISC 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.