XTN ranks 1st and SEA 4th of 8 funds in the Transportation Category.
SEA vs XTN
XTN −0.25pt a year
0.60%0.35%
XTN 3.7×the volume
19K71.3K
SEA +12.5pt
+27.0%+14.5%
SEA vs XTN Performance
+57.3%+17.0%
- SEA 0.60%
- XTN 0.35%, better
- SEA $19M
- XTN $216M
- SEA +57.3%, better
- XTN +17.0%
- SEA 4.42%, better
- XTN 0.76%
- SEA 32
- XTN 45
- SEA 19K sh
- XTN 71.3K sh, better
- SEA $20.81
- XTN $99.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SEA | XTN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A79Higher |
| Mission | B56 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | D25 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B67 | A86Higher |
| Durability | C46 | A70Higher |
Rank among Transportation funds
Same Category. SEA and XTN are both graded against the same 8 Transportation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SEAC
XTNB
In short
SEA One ticker for the whole freight chain: container ships, port operators, and air couriers. Fixed-tier weights keep the giant parcel names from swallowing the portfolio, with a 70/30 tilt toward sea over sky.
XTN Transportation, sliced evenly. XTN spreads roughly 40 airlines, truckers, railroads and freight names across a modified equal-weight index, so small caps get a real vote instead of a rounding error.
Stated mandate
SEA The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the U.S. Global SEA Index.
XTN The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SEA vs XTN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SEA vs XTN Cost
Overpaying SEA vs XTN
$4,691
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SEA 0.60%
$11,817
XTN 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SEA | XTN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $634 | $442 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,454 | $1,662 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $7,126 | $4,691 |
- 0.60%SEA
- 0.35%XTN, cheaper
- Middle half of Transportation funds
- Median 0.48%
XTN cheapest of 8 funds
SEA 5th cheapest of 8 funds
SEA vs XTN Dividends
- SEA 4.42%, better
- XTN 0.76%
- SEA $0.96
- XTN $0.75
- SEA $0.96
- XTN $0.19
- SEA Dec 24, 2025
- XTN Sep 21, 2026
- SEA Dec 26, 2025
- XTN Sep 23, 2026
- SEA Annual
- XTN Quarterly
Distribution history
SEA vs XTN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SEA 18.9%, betterXTN 23.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- SEA 1.13, betterXTN 0.50
- Worst fall
- SEA −39.5%XTN −35.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SEA 0.52XTN 1.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.