SIXJ ranks 4th and XBFR 48th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
SIXJ vs XBFR
SIXJ −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.79%
SIXJ 1.3×the volume
15.1K11.5K
SIXJ vs XBFR Performance
+1.1%+0.5%
- SIXJ 0.74%, better
- XBFR 0.79%
- SIXJ $148M
- XBFR $53M
- SIXJ +10.2%
- XBFR
- SIXJ 3
- XBFR 189
- SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
- XBFR 11.5K sh
- SIXJ $37.15
- XBFR $26.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SIXJ | XBFR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | C40 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | C53 | A85Higher |
| Durability | B57Higher | D30 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. SIXJ and XBFR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SIXJB
XBFRC
In short
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
XBFR Most buffer ETFs buy their cushion with a cap on gains. XBFR skips the cap: sub-adviser Parametric runs roughly 200 large-cap stocks behind a laddered options overlay targeting a 10% quarterly buffer, upside left uncapped.
Stated mandate
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
XBFR Actively managed ETF seeking capital appreciation from uncapped participation in large-cap U.S. equities while limiting losses through a laddered options strategy targeting quarterly 10% buffers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SIXJ vs XBFR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SIXJ vs XBFR Cost
Overpaying XBFR vs SIXJ
$867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
XBFR 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SIXJ | XBFR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,405 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $5,331 | $316 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $15,174 | $867 |
- 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
- 0.79%XBFR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
XBFR 34th cheapest of 77 funds
SIXJ vs XBFR Dividends
- SIXJ None
- XBFR
- SIXJ
- XBFR $0.02
- SIXJ
- XBFR Sep 30, 2026
- SIXJ
- XBFR Oct 2, 2026
- SIXJ
- XBFR Quarterly
Distribution history
SIXJ vs XBFR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SIXJ 5.9%XBFR
- Return per unit of risk
- SIXJ 1.67XBFR
- Worst fall
- SIXJ −14.1%XBFR
- Market sensitivity
- SIXJ 0.46XBFR 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.