Skip to content

XBFR vs ZALT

Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF

XBFRCNYSE Arca

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

XBFR0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 12.0×the volume

XBFR11.5KZALT138K

XBFR vs ZALT Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+0.5%XBFR+1.1%ZALT

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. XBFR +0.5%. ZALT +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
XBFR 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
XBFR $53M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
XBFR No data
ZALT +6.9%
Holdings
XBFR 189
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
XBFR 11.5K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
XBFR $26.70
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

XBFR: Cost 40, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 85, Durability 30. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for XBFR, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarXBFRZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC50A79Higher
Tradability15% weightD31B65Higher
Holdings10% weightA85A90Higher
Durability5% weightD30B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. XBFR and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and XBFR 48th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 48CFSEPFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 45
  4. Rank 48CXBFRInnovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 45
  5. Rank 53CFJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

XBFRCInnovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

XBFR Most buffer ETFs buy their cushion with a cap on gains. XBFR skips the cap: sub-adviser Parametric runs roughly 200 large-cap stocks behind a laddered options overlay targeting a 10% quarterly buffer, upside left uncapped.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

XBFR Actively managed ETF seeking capital appreciation from uncapped participation in large-cap U.S. equities while limiting losses through a laddered options strategy targeting quarterly 10% buffers.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • XBFR Buffer without the ceiling: the strategy targets roughly 10% of downside cushion while leaving participation in large-cap gains uncapped.innovatoretfs.com
  • The cushion ladders quarterly instead of resetting on one annual date, so entry timing matters less than it does with a dated defined-outcome fund.innovatoretfs.com
  • You own the stocks: Parametric manages roughly 200 large-cap names with an index options overlay, not a basket of FLEX options on a proxy.innovatoretfs.com
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • XBFR At 0.79% the fee sits at the middle of the shallow-buffer pack; ZALT and BUFM charge 0.69%, and PGIM's dated JUNP and AUGP charge 0.50%.
  • Buffers are targets, not promises. Innovator states there is no guarantee the fund delivers the sought-after protection against index losses.innovatoretfs.com
  • Launched in 2026 and lightly traded, so there is little record to judge and spreads can run wider than in the category's biggest names.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full XBFR profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

XBFR vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

XBFR vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying XBFR vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • XBFR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • XBFR 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XBFR $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearXBFRZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%XBFR
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

XBFR 34th cheapest of 77 funds

XBFR vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
XBFR No data
ZALT None
Last payment
XBFR $0.02
ZALT No data
Ex-dividend
XBFR Sep 30, 2026
ZALT No data
Paid on
XBFR Oct 2, 2026
ZALT No data
Frequency
XBFR Quarterly
ZALT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

XBFRQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll XBFR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments in 2026 YTD. Mar 31, 2026 $0.008; Jun 30, 2026 $0.02; Sep 30, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.022026YTD
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XBFR vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
XBFR No dataZALT 3.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
XBFR No dataZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
XBFR No dataZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
XBFR 0.47ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • XBFRCvsAUGPB

    Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XBFRCvsTENJB

    Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XBFRCvsSIXJB

    Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.