Skip to content

SIXZ vs XTR

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF

SIXZBCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTR −0.49pt a year

SIXZ0.74%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

SIXZ 3.3×the volume

SIXZ5.41KXTR1.64K

SIXZ vs XTR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.0%SIXZ+7.9%XTR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. SIXZ +10.0%. XTR +7.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SIXZ 0.74%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
SIXZ $65M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
SIXZ +10.0%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
SIXZ No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
SIXZ 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
SIXZ 5.41K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
SIXZ $32.80
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SIXZ: Cost 68, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings 47, Durability 47. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for SIXZ, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSIXZXTR
Cost30% weightB68A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB63HigherF18
Tradability15% weightD34HigherF13
Holdings10% weightC47A85Higher
Durability5% weightC47HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SIXZ and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXZ ranks 23rd and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 23BSEPTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETFScore 56
  2. Rank 23BSIXZAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 27CBJANInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SIXZBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

SIXZ Most buffered ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXZ runs six-month outcome periods, so the 10% downside buffer on the S&P 500 and the upside cap both reset every May and November.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

SIXZ The Fund uses recurring six-month Outcome Periods and resets its upside Cap at each period. For the May 1–October 31, 2026 period, the SEC disclosed an estimated pre-fee Cap range of 6.00%–9.00%.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • SIXZ Six-month outcome periods: the 10% buffer and the upside cap reset each May 1 and November 1 instead of sitting fixed for a full year.
  • At 0.74% a year, it charges less than the median fund in its shallow-buffer peer group.
  • Easy to trade for a defined-outcome fund, among the cleanest in its cohort, which matters most when you step in or out between reset dates.
  • Built as a registered 1940 Act fund tied to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, so you hold an ETF rather than a bank-issued structured note.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • SIXZ The price of the buffer is a ceiling. Strong six-month runs get trimmed, and the new cap is only set when each period opens.
  • Buffer and cap are measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy midway and your own protection and upside differ from the headline terms.
  • 0.74% adds up next to plain index funds, and some buffer peers ask less (ZALT 0.69%, BUFB 0.10%). It also launched in 2024, so the record is short.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full SIXZ profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

SIXZ vs XTR Holdings

As of

How SIXZ and XTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SIXZ and 0.0% of XTR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors99.6%

Sector

Sector weights in SIXZ and XTR, widest gap first
SectorMore in SIXZMore in XTR
TechnologyXTR +0.4 points
Health CareSIXZ +0.2 points
IndustrialsSIXZ +0.1 points
FinancialsSIXZ +0.1 points
Consumer StaplesSIXZ +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight
CommunicationXTR +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in SIXZ and XTR, widest gap first
CountryMore in SIXZMore in XTR
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SIXZ100.1%
  • XTR38.9%

Securities held

  • SIXZ2
  • XTR505

Asset class

SIXZ
Equity
XTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in SIXZ2
  • In both0
  • Only in XTR505

Only in SIXZ

2 securities, 99.8% of SIXZ by weight

  • Spy 10/30/2026 5.32 C99.78%
  • Spy 10/30/2026 718.59 P<0.01%

Only in XTR

505 securities, 99.9% of XTR by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp8.11%
  • Apple Inc7.37%
  • Microsoft Corp5.95%

Weight gaps

SIXZ and XTR share no securities.

All 5 SIXZ holdings⁠All 503 XTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SIXZ vs XTR Cost

Overpaying SIXZ vs XTR

$9,148

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SIXZ 0.74%

    $14,307

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SIXZ 0.74%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SIXZ $14,307XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearSIXZXTROverpaying
10$1,319$455$864
20$5,015$1,769$3,246
30$14,307$5,159$9,148

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%SIXZ
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

SIXZ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXZ vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
SIXZ No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
SIXZ None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
SIXZ No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
SIXZ No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
SIXZ No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
SIXZ No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

SIXZAll SIXZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

SIXZ vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SIXZ 6.0%since Jun 2024XTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SIXZ 0.89since Jun 2024XTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SIXZ −10.3%since May 2024XTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SIXZ 0.50XTR 0.94

SIXZ and XTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SIXZBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXZBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXZBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.