SIZE ranks 3rd and TMFC 19th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
SIZE vs TMFC
SIZE −0.35pt a year
0.15%0.50%
TMFC 13.9×the volume
5.21K72.6K
TMFC +5.0pt
+7.5%+12.5%
SIZE vs TMFC Performance
+43.6%+80.6%
- SIZE 0.15%, better
- TMFC 0.50%
- SIZE $433M
- TMFC $2.03B
- SIZE +13.8%, better
- TMFC +6.2%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- TMFC 0.13%
- SIZE 518
- TMFC 102
- SIZE 5.21K sh
- TMFC 72.6K sh, better
- SIZE $180.22
- TMFC $77.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SIZE | TMFC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | F19 |
| Mission | A93Higher | A81 |
| Risk | B66Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | F23 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | F22 |
| Durability | B57Higher | C45 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. SIZE and TMFC are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SIZEA
TMFCC
In short
SIZE The size factor without leaving the large-cap pool: SIZE holds roughly 500 US stocks and leans toward the smaller names in that universe, spreading weight away from the mega-cap giants. An iShares factor original from 2013.
TMFC The Motley Fool's stock-picking brand, boiled down to one ticker: roughly 100 large US companies held through the firm's own index, rules-based instead of alert-by-alert. The name costs extra.
Stated mandate
SIZE The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks that have smaller market capitalizations relative to their peers.
TMFC The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the Motley Fool 100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SIZE vs TMFC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SIZE vs TMFC Cost
Overpaying TMFC vs SIZE
$6,842
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SIZE 0.15%
$3,137
TMFC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SIZE | TMFC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $900 | $626 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $3,460 | $2,389 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $9,979 | $6,842 |
- 0.15%SIZE, cheaper
- 0.50%TMFC
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
SIZE 5th cheapest of 30 funds
TMFC 25th cheapest of 30 funds
SIZE vs TMFC Dividends
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- TMFC 0.13%
- SIZE $2.47
- TMFC $0.10
- SIZE $0.65
- TMFC $0.10
- SIZE Sep 15, 2026
- TMFC Dec 18, 2025
- SIZE Sep 18, 2026
- TMFC Dec 19, 2025
- SIZE Quarterly
- TMFC Annual
Distribution history
SIZE vs TMFC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SIZE
- TMFC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SIZE 13.0%, betterTMFC 15.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- SIZE 1.06TMFC 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- SIZE −24.0%, betterTMFC −33.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SIZE 0.97TMFC 1.14
SIZE and TMFC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
