TSLS ranks 3rd of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
SKHQ vs TSLS
0.0%by weight
TSLS −0.04pt a year
0.99%0.95%
TSLS 24.1×the volume
17K410K
SKHQ vs TSLS Performance
+28.7%−11.7%
- SKHQ 0.99%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- SKHQ $1M
- TSLS $39M
- SKHQ
- TSLS +1.0%
- SKHQ
- TSLS 3.11%
- SKHQ 2
- TSLS 4
- SKHQ 17K sh
- TSLS 410K sh, better
- SKHQ $13.13
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
- —SKHQNot yet graded
| Pillar | SKHQ | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97 | |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | A75 | |
| Tradability | C45 | |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Our read on each fund
SKHQ—
TSLSA
In short
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SKHQ vs TSLS Holdings
How SKHQ and TSLS differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SKHQ and 0.0% of TSLS.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SKHQ and TSLS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for TSLS.
Concentration
- SKHQ299.9%
- TSLS4297.0%
- SKHQ1
- TSLS2
Asset class
- SKHQ
- Equity
- TSLS
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in SKHQ1
- In both0
- Only in TSLS2
Only in SKHQ
1 security, 8.5% of SKHQ by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.54%
Only in TSLS
2 securities, 100% of TSLS by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506475.39%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut463.73%
Weight gaps
SKHQ and TSLS share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SKHQ vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying SKHQ vs TSLS
$656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SKHQ 0.99%
$18,525
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SKHQ | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,678 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $6,322 | $243 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $17,869 | $656 |
- 0.99%SKHQ
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
SKHQ 6th cheapest of 43 funds
SKHQ vs TSLS Dividends
- SKHQ
- TSLS 3.11%
- SKHQ None
- TSLS $1.57
- SKHQ
- TSLS $0.40
- SKHQ
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- SKHQ
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- SKHQ
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
SKHQ vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SKHQ TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SKHQ TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- SKHQ TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- SKHQ 0.00TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.