SMST ranks 19th and SKHZ 27th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
SKHZ vs SMST
0.0%by weight
SKHZ −0.63pt a year
0.75%1.38%
SKHZ 1.9×the volume
1.9M984K
SKHZ vs SMST Performance
−14.7%−73.6%
- SKHZ 0.75%, better
- SMST 1.38%
- SKHZ $4M
- SMST $8M
- SKHZ
- SMST −57.2%
- SKHZ 2
- SMST 2
- SKHZ 1.9M sh, better
- SMST 984K sh
- SKHZ $11.21
- SMST $15.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SKHZ | SMST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A71Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F20 | C52Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. SKHZ and SMST are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SKHZA
SMSTB
In short
SMST The first US ETF built to short MicroStrategy (now Strategy), launched in 2024 and moved from -1.5x to -2x within weeks. It aims for twice the inverse of MSTR's daily move, one day at a time, at 1.38% a year with no fee waiver.
Stated mandate
SMST The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to negative two times the daily percentage change in MicroStrategy Incorporated's share price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SKHZ vs SMST Holdings
How SKHZ and SMST differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SKHZ and 0.0% of SMST.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SKHZ and SMST.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SKHZMore in SMST | SKHZ | SMST |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SKHZ200.0%
- SMST320.6%
- SKHZ1
- SMST2
Asset class
- SKHZ
- Equity
- SMST
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in SKHZ1
- In both0
- Only in SMST2
Only in SKHZ
1 security, 46.4% of SKHZ by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204046.40%
Only in SMST
2 securities, 100% of SMST by weight
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031165.92%
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/2026154.66%
Weight gaps
SKHZ and SMST share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SKHZ vs SMST Cost
Overpaying SMST vs SKHZ
$10,072
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SKHZ 0.75%
$14,482
SMST 1.38%
$24,554
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SKHZ | SMST | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $2,395 | $1,059 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $8,848 | $3,770 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $24,554 | $10,072 |
- 0.75%SKHZ, cheaper
- 1.38%SMST
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
SKHZ cheapest of 43 funds
SMST 29th cheapest of 43 funds
SKHZ vs SMST Dividends
- SKHZ None
- SMST None
Distribution history
SKHZ vs SMST Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SKHZ SMST 180.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- SKHZ SMST −0.32
- Worst fall
- SKHZ SMST −99.5%
- Market sensitivity
- SKHZ 0.00SMST −3.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.