SVXY ranks 1st and SMN 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
SMN vs SVXY
100%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
SVXY 521.6×the volume
2.86K1.49M
SVXY +23.5pt
−25.2%−1.7%
SMN vs SVXY Performance
−57.8%+96.6%
- SMN 0.95%
- SVXY 0.95%
- SMN $4M
- SVXY $201M
- SMN −35.6%
- SVXY +21.9%, better
- SMN 3.21%
- SVXY
- SMN 1
- SVXY 1
- SMN 2.86K sh
- SVXY 1.49M sh, better
- SMN $18.68
- SVXY $60.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMN | SVXY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C44 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | F21 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C45 | A76Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. SMN and SVXY are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMNC
SVXYB
In short
SMN The only -2x ETF pointed at the S&P 500's materials sector: chemicals, miners and packagers, flipped and doubled, reset every single day. A trading tool that has been listed since 2007, not a set-and-forget hedge.
SVXY Short volatility, half dose. SVXY targets one-half the inverse of a VIX short-term futures index each day, a deliberately de-tuned take on the short-vol trade, and it has run that mandate since 2011.
Stated mandate
SMN The fund targets daily, pre-expense performance equal to negative two times the S&P Materials Select Sector SM Index.
SVXY SVXY seeks daily results equal to one-half the inverse of the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index. Its objective is measured daily, so returns over longer periods can differ from the stated daily target.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMN vs SVXY Holdings
How SMN and SVXY differ
100%
Shared holdings make up 100% of SMN and 100% of SVXY.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SMN and SVXY.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SMN and SVXY.
Concentration
- SMN100.0%
- SVXY100.0%
- SMN0
- SVXY0
Asset class
- SMN
- Equity
- SVXY
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in SMN0
- In both0
- Only in SVXY0
Only in SMN
0 securities, 0.0% of SMN by weight
Only in SVXY
0 securities, 0.0% of SVXY by weight
Weight gaps
SMN and SVXY share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMN vs SVXY Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMN 0.95%
$17,869
SVXY 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMN | SVXY |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%SMN
- 0.95%SVXY
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
SMN 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SVXY 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SMN vs SVXY Dividends
- SMN 3.21%
- SVXY
- SMN $0.60
- SVXY None
- SMN $0.15
- SVXY
- SMN Sep 23, 2026
- SVXY
- SMN Sep 29, 2026
- SVXY
- SMN Quarterly
- SVXY
Distribution history
SMN vs SVXY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SMN
- SVXY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMN 33.5%SVXY 26.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SMN −0.65SVXY 0.42, better
- Worst fall
- SMN −66.8%SVXY −46.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SMN −1.36SVXY 1.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.