RWM ranks 4th and SMN 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs SMN
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 10514.4×the volume
30M2.86K
RWM +14.1pt
−11.1%−25.2%
RWM vs SMN Performance
−18.3%−57.8%
- RWM 0.95%
- SMN 0.95%
- RWM $163M
- SMN $4M
- RWM −10.2%, better
- SMN −35.6%
- RWM 3.32%, better
- SMN 3.21%
- RWM 3
- SMN 1
- RWM 30M sh, better
- SMN 2.86K sh
- RWM $14.37
- SMN $18.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | SMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | C45 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and SMN are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
SMNC
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SMN The only -2x ETF pointed at the S&P 500's materials sector: chemicals, miners and packagers, flipped and doubled, reset every single day. A trading tool that has been listed since 2007, not a set-and-forget hedge.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
SMN The fund targets daily, pre-expense performance equal to negative two times the S&P Materials Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs SMN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs SMN Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
SMN 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | SMN |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.95%SMN
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SMN 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs SMN Dividends
- RWM 3.32%, better
- SMN 3.21%
- RWM $0.48
- SMN $0.60
- RWM $0.09
- SMN $0.15
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- SMN Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- SMN Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- SMN Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs SMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWM
- SMN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterSMN 33.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99SMN −0.65, better
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%, betterSMN −66.8%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23SMN −1.36
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.