VONV ranks 1st and SMOT 77th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
SMOT vs VONV
VONV −0.43pt a year
0.49%0.06%
VONV 35.9×the volume
21.6K774K
VONV +6.3pt
+16.9%+23.2%
SMOT vs VONV Performance
+14.8%+28.5%
- SMOT 0.49%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- SMOT $324M
- VONV $23.3B
- SMOT +14.8%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- SMOT 1.23%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- SMOT 111
- VONV 873
- SMOT 21.6K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- SMOT $40.63
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMOT | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B62 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D34 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B63Higher | C49 |
| Durability | D34 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. SMOT and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMOTC
VONVA
In short
SMOT Morningstar's moat research, aimed down the cap ladder. SMOT tracks an index of small- and mid-cap companies flagged for durable competitive advantages, and buys them only when they screen as attractively valued.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
SMOT The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus Index, an index of small- and mid-cap companies selected for sustainable competitive advantages and attractive valuations.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMOT vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMOT vs VONV Cost
Overpaying SMOT vs VONV
$8,522
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMOT 0.49%
$9,792
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMOT | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $110 | $773 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $432 | $2,962 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $1,270 | $8,522 |
- 0.49%SMOT
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
SMOT 73rd cheapest of 99 funds
SMOT vs VONV Dividends
- SMOT 1.23%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- SMOT $0.50
- VONV $1.74
- SMOT $0.50
- VONV $0.42
- SMOT Dec 22, 2025
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- SMOT Dec 26, 2025
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- SMOT Annual
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
SMOT vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMOT 16.1%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SMOT 0.78VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- SMOT −23.4%VONV −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SMOT 1.11VONV 0.85
SMOT and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

