TQQQ ranks 1st and SOXL 4th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
SOXL vs TQQQ
11.4%by weight
SOXL −0.03pt a year
0.75%0.78%
SOXL 1.2×the volume
70.7M57.5M
SOXL +1.5pt
+39.4%+37.9%
SOXL vs TQQQ Performance
+66.7%+64.2%
- SOXL 0.75%, better
- TQQQ 0.78%
- SOXL $24.3B
- TQQQ $32.1B
- SOXL +61.4%, better
- TQQQ +7.1%
- SOXL 0.12%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- SOXL 43
- TQQQ 116
- SOXL 70.7M sh, better
- TQQQ 57.5M sh
- SOXL $102.45
- TQQQ $61.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOXL | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A97 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | D32 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | A79 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69 | A79Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. SOXL and TQQQ are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOXLA
TQQQA
In short
SOXL A 3x bet on chip stocks that resets every single day. Direxion launched it in 2010, long before AI made semiconductors the market's main event, and it is now one of the most heavily traded leveraged funds out there.
TQQQ The original 3x Nasdaq-100 trade, live since 2010. Leverage resets every day, chasing three times the index's one-day move, and it is one of the most heavily traded names in its corner of the market.
Stated mandate
SOXL It is designed to deliver a daily result three times the performance of the NYSE Semiconductor Index, before fees and expenses, with the objective applying for a single day.
TQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOXL vs TQQQ Holdings
How SOXL and TQQQ differ
11.4%
Shared holdings make up 17.7% of SOXL and 14.2% of TQQQ.
Level by level
- Holdings11.4%
- Sector60.3%
- Country90.2%
Sector
| Sector | More in SOXLMore in TQQQ | SOXL | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | SOXL +39.7 points | 100.0% | 60.3% |
| Communication | TQQQ +12.6 points | 0.0% | 12.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | TQQQ +10.1 points | 0.0% | 10.1% |
| Consumer Staples | TQQQ +5.6 points | 0.0% | 5.6% |
| Industrials | TQQQ +5.1 points | 0.0% | 5.1% |
| Health Care | TQQQ +3.8 points | 0.0% | 3.8% |
| Utilities | TQQQ +1.0 points | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Materials | TQQQ +0.9 points | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Energy | TQQQ +0.5 points | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Financials | TQQQ +0.2 points | 0.0% | 0.2% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SOXLMore in TQQQ | SOXL | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | TQQQ +8.0 points | 89.3% | 97.3% |
| Taiwan | SOXL +4.7 points | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| South Korea | SOXL +3.0 points | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| Israel | SOXL +1.1 points | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Canada | TQQQ +1.1 points | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| Netherlands | SOXL +0.6 points | 1.5% | 0.9% |
| Other countries (4) | TQQQ +0.4 points | 0.4% | 0.8% |
Concentration
- SOXL74.3%
- TQQQ54.5%
- SOXL32
- TQQQ115
Asset class
- SOXL
- Equity
- TQQQ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in SOXL13
- In both19
- Only in TQQQ96
Only in SOXL
13 securities, 7.6% of SOXL by weight
- Jp Morgan 100 Us Trsy Capital 31632.46%
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5061.94%
- Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.66%
- Sk Hynix Inc-Adr0.62%
- On Semiconductor0.33%
- Credo Technology Group Holdi0.32%
- Entegris Inc0.28%
- Tower Semiconductor Ltd0.23%
- Ase Technology Holding -Adr0.21%
- Macom Technology Solutions H0.21%
- Cerebras Systems Inc - A0.13%
- United Microelectron-Sp Adr0.12%
- Stmicroelectronics Nv-Ny Shs0.09%
Only in TQQQ
96 securities, 70.7% of TQQQ by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf16.45%
- Apple Inc3.90%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-263.31%
- Microsoft Corp3.00%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-012.42%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-102.27%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-292.11%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-192.02%
- Amazon.com Inc2.01%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-121.96%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-241.74%
- Tesla Inc1.63%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-02-111.50%
- Meta Platforms Inc-Class A1.42%
- Walmart Inc1.29%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A1.27%
- Space Exploration Techn-Cl A1.24%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-051.21%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C1.19%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-031.06%
- Costco Wholesale Corp0.96%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A0.91%
- Cisco Systems Inc0.88%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.64%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-030.61%
- Netflix Inc0.55%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.55%
- Amgen Inc0.54%
- Linde PLC0.51%
- Gilead Sciences Inc0.45%
- Shopify Inc - Class A0.41%
- Pepsico Inc0.40%
- Sandisk Corp0.36%
- T-Mobile Us Inc0.36%
- Intuitive Surgical Inc0.33%
- Seagate Technology Holdings0.31%
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.30%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-170.30%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-02-090.30%
- Western Digital Corp0.28%
- Starbucks Corp0.25%
- Automatic Data Processing0.25%
- Booking Holdings Inc0.24%
- Marriott International -Cl A0.22%
- Fortinet Inc0.21%
- Adobe Inc0.21%
- Csx Corp0.21%
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals0.20%
- Intuit Inc0.20%
- Constellation Energy0.20%
Weight gaps
All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in SOXLMore in TQQQ | SOXL | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | TQQQ +2.22 points | 1.60% | 3.82% |
| Intel Corp | SOXL +0.96 points | 1.70% | 0.74% |
| Nxp Semiconductors NV | SOXL +0.63 points | 0.77% | 0.14% |
| Analog Devices Inc | SOXL +0.56 points | 0.99% | 0.43% |
| Qualcomm Inc | SOXL +0.53 points | 0.90% | 0.37% |
| Micron Technology Inc | TQQQ +0.53 points | 1.61% | 2.14% |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | SOXL +0.52 points | 0.65% | 0.13% |
| Marvell Technology Inc | SOXL +0.48 points | 0.85% | 0.37% |
| Teradyne Inc | SOXL +0.44 points | 0.53% | 0.09% |
| Microchip Technology Inc | SOXL +0.40 points | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Texas Instruments Inc | SOXL +0.40 points | 0.99% | 0.59% |
| Astera Labs Inc | SOXL +0.37 points | 0.47% | 0.10% |
| Kla Corp | SOXL +0.35 points | 0.79% | 0.44% |
| Broadcom Inc | SOXL +0.34 points | 1.54% | 1.20% |
| Advanced Micro Devices | SOXL +0.23 points | 1.99% | 1.76% |
| Arm Holdings Plc-Adr | TQQQ +0.10 points | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Applied Materials Inc | SOXL +0.10 points | 0.76% | 0.66% |
| Lam Research Corp | SOXL +0.06 points | 0.70% | 0.64% |
| Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs | TQQQ +0.01 points | 0.31% | 0.32% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOXL vs TQQQ Cost
Overpaying TQQQ vs SOXL
$520
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOXL 0.75%
$14,482
TQQQ 0.78%
$15,002
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOXL | TQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,388 | $52 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,268 | $190 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $15,002 | $520 |
- 0.75%SOXL, cheaper
- 0.78%TQQQ
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
SOXL cheapest of 30 funds
TQQQ 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
SOXL vs TQQQ Dividends
- SOXL 0.12%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- SOXL $0.09
- TQQQ $0.48
- SOXL $0.09
- TQQQ $0.16
- SOXL Sep 22, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- SOXL Sep 29, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- SOXL Annual
- TQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
SOXL vs TQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SOXL
- TQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOXL 137.2%TQQQ 56.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SOXL 0.90TQQQ 0.98, better
- Worst fall
- SOXL −90.5%TQQQ −81.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SOXL 7.64TQQQ 3.71
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.