Skip to content

SOYB vs WEAT

Teucrium Soybean Fund

SOYBBNYSE Arca

Teucrium Wheat Fund

WEATBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

WEAT −0.01pt a year

SOYB0.63%WEAT0.62%

Avg volume · 30D

WEAT 7.8×the volume

SOYB68.9KWEAT538K

10Y return · a year

SOYB +7.9pt

SOYB+3.0%WEAT−4.9%

SOYB vs WEAT Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.1%SOYB−41.0%WEAT

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. SOYB +20.1%. WEAT −41.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SOYB 0.63%
WEAT 0.62%, better
Fund size
SOYB $39M
WEAT $234M
1Y total return
SOYB +13.0%, better
WEAT +4.7%
Holdings
SOYB 12
WEAT 31
Avg volume (30D)
SOYB 68.9K sh
WEAT 538K sh, better
NAV per share
SOYB $26.14
WEAT $22.21
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SOYB: Cost 69, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 49. WEAT: Cost 76, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings not scored, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for SOYB, WEAT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSOYBWEAT
Cost30% weightB69A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56HigherD26
Tradability15% weightA76A84Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC49B61Higher

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SOYB and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

SOYB ranks 2nd and WEAT 2nd of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SOYBBTeucrium Soybean Fund

WEATBTeucrium Wheat Fund

In short

SOYB Soybeans, straight up. Since 2011 SOYB has tracked a benchmark of soybean futures for future delivery, wrapped so you can buy the bean in an ordinary brokerage account, and it charges less than the typical commodity futures fund.

WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.

Stated mandate

SOYB SOYB seeks to track daily changes in the soybean market for future delivery through its benchmark.

WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.

Why people hold it

  • SOYB Fee of 0.63% a year sits under the 0.81% median for commodity futures funds, and under diversified rival PDBC at 0.74%.
  • A single-crop play, not a commodity grab bag: the fund follows the Teucrium Soybean Index, which tracks daily moves in soybean futures.
  • Trading since 2011, a long run for a one-commodity fund, and one of the stronger implementations in its commodity futures peer group.
  • WEAT Costs 0.62% a year, under the typical fee for futures-based commodity funds. Cheap matters most when the thing you own throws off no income.
  • The benchmark splits across three CBOT contracts: 35% second-to-expire, 30% third-to-expire, 35% the following December. Roll risk gets spread down the curve, not stacked on one month.teucrium.com
  • Wheat exposure without a futures account: no margin posting, no roll management, no contract expiries on your calendar. Buy it like a stock, sell it like a stock.teucrium.com
  • Among futures-based commodity funds, one of the stronger overall packages on cost and structure.

Worth knowing

  • SOYB One crop, one price. Weather, harvest cycles and export demand move soybean futures hard, and there is nothing else in the portfolio to soften it.
  • It is a commodity pool, not a standard 1940 Act fund, so the tax paperwork differs from a stock ETF. Check how that lands on your return.
  • Mid-sized asset base and moderate turnover mean bid-ask spreads can run wider than on the giant index funds, and the payoff comes from price moves, not income.
  • WEAT It is a commodity pool taxed as a partnership, so shareholders get a Schedule K-1 with Section 1256 treatment (60% long-term, 40% short-term), not a 1099.teucrium.com
  • The fund tracks wheat futures, not the spot price. When the curve slopes against you, returns can drift from the wheat headlines you read.teucrium.com
  • One crop, one market, and weather sets the price. Swings here run hot compared with diversified commodity baskets, and the fund is built for price exposure, not income.

Full SOYB profile⁠

Full WEAT profile⁠

SOYB vs WEAT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SOYB vs WEAT Cost

Overpaying SOYB vs WEAT

$180

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SOYB 0.63%

    $12,359

  • WEAT 0.62%

    $12,179

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SOYB 0.63%
  • WEAT 0.62%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530SOYB $12,359WEAT $12,179

Year by year

YearSOYBWEATOverpaying
10$1,128$1,111$17
20$4,311$4,246$65
30$12,359$12,179$180

Expense ratio

  • 0.63%SOYB
  • 0.62%WEAT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds

SOYB 5th cheapest of 13 funds

SOYB vs WEAT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
SOYB None
WEAT None

Distribution history

SOYBAll SOYB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

WEATAll WEAT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SOYB vs WEAT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • SOYB
  • WEAT
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: WEAT −67.8% · Dec 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SOYB 15.1%, betterWEAT 22.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SOYB −0.33, betterWEAT −0.46
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SOYB −31.0%, betterWEAT −67.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SOYB 0.44WEAT 0.68

SOYB and WEAT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SOYBBvsPDBCA

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsPDBCA

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOYBBvsCMDTB

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsCMDTB

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOYBBvsUSGB

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsUSGB

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.