SOYB ranks 2nd and WEAT 2nd of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
SOYB vs WEAT
WEAT −0.01pt a year
0.63%0.62%
WEAT 7.8×the volume
68.9K538K
SOYB +7.9pt
+3.0%−4.9%
SOYB vs WEAT Performance
+20.1%−41.0%
- SOYB 0.63%
- WEAT 0.62%, better
- SOYB $39M
- WEAT $234M
- SOYB +13.0%, better
- WEAT +4.7%
- SOYB 12
- WEAT 31
- SOYB 68.9K sh
- WEAT 538K sh, better
- SOYB $26.14
- WEAT $22.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOYB | WEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | A76 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C49 | B61Higher |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. SOYB and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOYBB
WEATB
In short
SOYB Soybeans, straight up. Since 2011 SOYB has tracked a benchmark of soybean futures for future delivery, wrapped so you can buy the bean in an ordinary brokerage account, and it charges less than the typical commodity futures fund.
WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.
Stated mandate
SOYB SOYB seeks to track daily changes in the soybean market for future delivery through its benchmark.
WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOYB vs WEAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOYB vs WEAT Cost
Overpaying SOYB vs WEAT
$180
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOYB 0.63%
$12,359
WEAT 0.62%
$12,179
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOYB | WEAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $1,111 | $17 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $4,246 | $65 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $12,179 | $180 |
- 0.63%SOYB
- 0.62%WEAT, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds
SOYB 5th cheapest of 13 funds
SOYB vs WEAT Dividends
- SOYB None
- WEAT None
Distribution history
SOYB vs WEAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SOYB
- WEAT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOYB 15.1%, betterWEAT 22.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- SOYB −0.33, betterWEAT −0.46
- Worst fall
- SOYB −31.0%, betterWEAT −67.8%
- Market sensitivity
- SOYB 0.44WEAT 0.68
SOYB and WEAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



