SPMD ranks 1st and XJH 4th of 11 funds in the S&P MidCap 400 Category.
SPMD vs XJH
SPMD −0.09pt a year
0.03%0.12%
SPMD 90.2×the volume
1.73M19.2K
SPMD +0.4pt
+6.7%+6.3%
SPMD vs XJH Performance
+38.1%+35.6%
- SPMD 0.03%, better
- XJH 0.12%
- SPMD $18.4B
- XJH $412M
- SPMD +16.1%
- XJH +17.2%, better
- SPMD 1.29%, better
- XJH 1.12%
- SPMD 402
- XJH 361
- SPMD 1.73M sh, better
- XJH 19.2K sh
- SPMD $63.19
- XJH $48.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SPMD | XJH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | B68 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B57Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A85Higher | A78 |
| Durability | A73Higher | D37 |
Rank among S&P MidCap 400 funds
Same Category. SPMD and XJH are both graded against the same 11 S&P MidCap 400 funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SPMDA
XJHB
In short
SPMD Four ETFs track the S&P MidCap 400. This is the cheapest of them at 0.03%, a fraction of what the priciest wrapper on the identical 400 stocks charges. Same index, smaller toll booth.
XJH The S&P MidCap 400 with a bouncer at the door. XJH tracks a screened version of the same mid-cap benchmark, dropping companies tied to tobacco, thermal coal, oil sands, fossil fuel reserves and weapons.
Stated mandate
SPMD The fund seeks to track the total return performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index before fees and expenses, providing exposure to mid-cap U.S. equities.
XJH The fund seeks to track an ESG-screened version of the S&P MidCap 400 Index, providing core U.S. mid-cap equity exposure while excluding certain controversial business activities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPMD vs XJH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPMD vs XJH Cost
Overpaying XJH vs SPMD
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPMD 0.03%
$638
XJH 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPMD | XJH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $220 | $165 |
| 20 | $216 | $859 | $643 |
| 30 | $638 | $2,520 | $1,882 |
- 0.03%SPMD, cheaper
- 0.12%XJH
- Middle half of S&P MidCap 400 funds
- Median 0.15%
SPMD cheapest of 11 funds
XJH 4th cheapest of 11 funds
SPMD vs XJH Dividends
- SPMD 1.29%, better
- XJH 1.12%
- SPMD $0.84
- XJH $0.57
- SPMD $0.23
- XJH $0.14
- SPMD Sep 21, 2026
- XJH Sep 15, 2026
- SPMD Sep 23, 2026
- XJH Sep 18, 2026
- SPMD Quarterly
- XJH Quarterly
Distribution history
SPMD vs XJH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SPMD
- XJH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPMD 15.1%, betterXJH 15.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SPMD 0.85, betterXJH 0.81
- Worst fall
- SPMD −24.1%, betterXJH −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SPMD 1.02XJH 1.05
SPMD and XJH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
