VONV ranks 1st and SPVM 64th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
SPVM vs VONV
VONV −0.33pt a year
0.39%0.06%
VONV 80.4×the volume
9.62K774K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+12.0%+12.0%
SPVM vs VONV Performance
+71.2%+73.8%
- SPVM 0.39%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- SPVM $142M
- VONV $23.3B
- SPVM +22.6%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- SPVM 1.81%, better
- VONV 1.53%
- SPVM 103
- VONV 873
- SPVM 9.62K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- SPVM $77.73
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SPVM | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B57 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A70 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B58Higher | C49 |
| Durability | C54 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. SPVM and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SPVMC
VONVA
In short
SPVM Value usually means catching a falling knife. SPVM screens the S&P 500 for stocks scoring high on both value and momentum, holding about 100 names: cheap, but already moving.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
SPVM The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, which selects 100 stocks from the S&P 500 and represents large-cap U.S. equities.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPVM vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPVM vs VONV Cost
Overpaying SPVM vs VONV
$6,628
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPVM 0.39%
$7,898
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPVM | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $110 | $595 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $432 | $2,293 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $1,270 | $6,628 |
- 0.39%SPVM
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
SPVM 64th cheapest of 99 funds
SPVM vs VONV Dividends
- SPVM 1.81%, better
- VONV 1.53%
- SPVM $1.41
- VONV $1.74
- SPVM $0.38
- VONV $0.42
- SPVM Sep 21, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- SPVM Sep 25, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- SPVM Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
SPVM vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SPVM
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPVM 13.3%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SPVM 1.19VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- SPVM −19.5%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SPVM 0.69VONV 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

