SPYM ranks 1st of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.
SPYM vs VGT
SPYM −0.07pt a year
0.02%0.09%
SPYM 2.9×the volume
12.1M4.23M
VGT +8.9pt
+15.7%+24.6%
SPYM vs VGT Performance
+80.7%+136.3%
- SPYM 0.02%, better
- VGT 0.09%
- SPYM $183B
- VGT $178B
- SPYM +13.7%
- VGT +24.7%, better
- SPYM 1.00%, better
- VGT 0.38%
- SPYM 508
- VGT 321
- SPYM 12.1M sh, better
- VGT 4.23M sh
- SPYM $90.06
- VGT $122.79
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | SPYM | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99 | A92 |
| Mission | A100 | A84 |
| Risk | C51 | B55 |
| Tradability | A72 | B57 |
| Holdings | B57 | C41 |
| Durability | A79 | A93 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
VGT ranks 3rd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
Our read on each fund
SPYMA
VGTA
In short
SPYM State Street's budget-priced S&P 500 tracker: the same 500 large caps as its famous sibling, for 0.02% a year, the lowest fee in its S&P 500 peer group. Running since 2005 and now one of the category's giants.
VGT Vanguard's technology sleeve, indexed since 2004: roughly 300 US tech stocks running from megacap giants down to small caps, for 0.09% a year. Broad coverage of the sector rather than just its household names.
Stated mandate
SPYM The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S. large-cap equities.
VGT The fund seeks to track an index measuring the investment return of information technology stocks. It uses an indexing approach for large-, mid-, and small-capitalization U.S. technology companies and normally invests at least 80% of assets in target-index stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPYM vs VGT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPYM vs VGT Cost
Overpaying VGT vs SPYM
$1,472
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPYM 0.02%
$426
VGT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPYM | VGT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $37 | $165 | $128 |
| 20 | $144 | $646 | $502 |
| 30 | $426 | $1,898 | $1,472 |
- 0.02%SPYM, cheaper
- 0.09%VGT
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
SPYM among 14 S&P 500 funds
- Middle half of S&P 500 funds
- Median 0.09%
SPYM cheapest of 14 funds
VGT among 23 Technology (Broad) funds
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
VGT 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
SPYM vs VGT Dividends
- SPYM 1.00%, better
- VGT 0.38%
- SPYM $0.91
- VGT $0.47
- SPYM $0.24
- VGT $0.15
- SPYM Sep 11, 2026
- VGT Sep 23, 2026
- SPYM Sep 15, 2026
- VGT Sep 25, 2026
- SPYM Quarterly
- VGT Quarterly
Distribution history
SPYM vs VGT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SPYM
- VGT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPYM 12.4%, betterVGT 21.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SPYM 1.37, betterVGT 1.30
- Worst fall
- SPYM −24.5%, betterVGT −35.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SPYM 1.01VGT 1.35
SPYM and VGT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.08%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.





