IVV ranks 2nd of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.
IVV vs VGT
IVV −0.06pt a year
0.03%0.09%
IVV 1.5×the volume
6.39M4.23M
VGT +8.9pt
+15.7%+24.6%
IVV vs VGT Performance
+80.7%+136.3%
- IVV 0.03%, better
- VGT 0.09%
- IVV $889B
- VGT $178B
- IVV +13.7%
- VGT +24.7%, better
- IVV 1.08%, better
- VGT 0.38%
- IVV 507
- VGT 321
- IVV 6.39M sh, better
- VGT 4.23M sh
- IVV $775.30
- VGT $122.79
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | IVV | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84 | A92 |
| Mission | A100 | A84 |
| Risk | C51 | B55 |
| Tradability | A80 | B57 |
| Holdings | B55 | C41 |
| Durability | A86 | A93 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
VGT ranks 3rd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
Our read on each fund
IVVA
VGTA
In short
IVV The 2000-vintage iShares take on the S&P 500, now a $100B-plus cornerstone holding: roughly 500 large US companies, 0.03% a year, and tracking that stays tight to the index.
VGT Vanguard's technology sleeve, indexed since 2004: roughly 300 US tech stocks running from megacap giants down to small caps, for 0.09% a year. Broad coverage of the sector rather than just its household names.
Stated mandate
IVV The fund seeks to track the investment results of an index made up of large-capitalization U.S. equities.
VGT The fund seeks to track an index measuring the investment return of information technology stocks. It uses an indexing approach for large-, mid-, and small-capitalization U.S. technology companies and normally invests at least 80% of assets in target-index stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVV vs VGT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVV vs VGT Cost
Overpaying VGT vs IVV
$1,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVV 0.03%
$638
VGT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVV | VGT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $165 | $110 |
| 20 | $216 | $646 | $430 |
| 30 | $638 | $1,898 | $1,260 |
- 0.03%IVV, cheaper
- 0.09%VGT
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
IVV among 14 S&P 500 funds
- Middle half of S&P 500 funds
- Median 0.09%
IVV 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
VGT among 23 Technology (Broad) funds
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
VGT 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
IVV vs VGT Dividends
- IVV 1.08%, better
- VGT 0.38%
- IVV $8.40
- VGT $0.47
- IVV $2.20
- VGT $0.15
- IVV Sep 15, 2026
- VGT Sep 23, 2026
- IVV Sep 18, 2026
- VGT Sep 25, 2026
- IVV Quarterly
- VGT Quarterly
Distribution history
IVV vs VGT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IVV
- VGT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVV 12.4%, betterVGT 21.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVV 1.37, betterVGT 1.30
- Worst fall
- IVV −24.5%, betterVGT −35.1%
- Market sensitivity
- IVV 1.00VGT 1.35
IVV and VGT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.02%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.





