VYM ranks 2nd and SRHQ 65th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
SRHQ vs VYM
VYM −0.31pt a year
0.35%0.04%
VYM 441.4×the volume
2.6K1.15M
SRHQ +2.1pt
+22.3%+20.2%
SRHQ vs VYM Performance
+32.7%+18.9%
- SRHQ 0.35%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- SRHQ $228M
- VYM $78.9B
- SRHQ +32.7%, better
- VYM +18.9%
- SRHQ 0.68%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- SRHQ 80
- VYM 610
- SRHQ 2.6K sh
- VYM 1.15M sh, better
- SRHQ $50.10
- VYM $159.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SRHQ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A71 | A81Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | F19 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | B56Higher | C53 |
| Durability | D33 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. SRHQ and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SRHQC
VYMA
In short
SRHQ GARP in an index wrapper: SRHQ screens U.S. stocks for growth, quality and value together instead of picking one lane. A boutique shop's rules-based take on a blend most factor funds split apart.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
SRHQ The Fund seeks to track the SRH U.S. Quality Index before fees and expenses through passive indexing.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SRHQ vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SRHQ vs VYM Cost
Overpaying SRHQ vs VYM
$6,277
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SRHQ 0.35%
$7,126
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SRHQ | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $73 | $561 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $288 | $2,166 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $849 | $6,277 |
- 0.35%SRHQ
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
SRHQ 56th cheapest of 99 funds
SRHQ vs VYM Dividends
- SRHQ 0.68%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- SRHQ $0.35
- VYM $3.68
- SRHQ $0.09
- VYM $0.89
- SRHQ Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- SRHQ Sep 25, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- SRHQ Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
SRHQ vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SRHQ 13.8%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SRHQ 1.24VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- SRHQ −18.5%VYM −15.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SRHQ 0.84VYM 0.74
SRHQ and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


