VONV ranks 1st and SRHQ 65th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
SRHQ vs VONV
VONV −0.29pt a year
0.35%0.06%
VONV 298.1×the volume
2.6K776K
VONV +0.9pt
+22.3%+23.2%
SRHQ vs VONV Performance
+32.7%+30.6%
- SRHQ 0.35%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- SRHQ $228M
- VONV $21.7B
- SRHQ +32.7%, better
- VONV +30.6%
- SRHQ 0.68%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- SRHQ 80
- VONV 887
- SRHQ 2.6K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- SRHQ $50.10
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SRHQ | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A71 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | F19 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | B56Higher | C49 |
| Durability | D33 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. SRHQ and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SRHQC
VONVA
In short
SRHQ GARP in an index wrapper: SRHQ screens U.S. stocks for growth, quality and value together instead of picking one lane. A boutique shop's rules-based take on a blend most factor funds split apart.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
SRHQ The Fund seeks to track the SRH U.S. Quality Index before fees and expenses through passive indexing.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SRHQ vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SRHQ vs VONV Cost
Overpaying SRHQ vs VONV
$5,856
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SRHQ 0.35%
$7,126
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SRHQ | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $110 | $524 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $432 | $2,022 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,270 | $5,856 |
- 0.35%SRHQ
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
SRHQ 56th cheapest of 99 funds
SRHQ vs VONV Dividends
- SRHQ 0.68%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- SRHQ $0.35
- VONV $1.74
- SRHQ $0.09
- VONV $0.42
- SRHQ Sep 24, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- SRHQ Sep 25, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- SRHQ Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
SRHQ vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SRHQ 13.8%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SRHQ 1.24VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- SRHQ −18.5%VONV −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SRHQ 0.84VONV 0.85
SRHQ and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

